Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery

Chapter 26: Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery

H Patterson and AH Steven

FIGURE 26.1 Area of the Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery, 2018

TABLE 26.1 Status of the Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery
Status 20172018Comments
Biological status Fishing mortality BiomassFishing mortalityBiomass 
Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides)Not subject to overfishingNot overfishedNot subject to overfishingNot overfishedTACs are set in accordance with a precautionary harvest strategy. Most recent estimate of biomass is above the limit reference point.
Economic statusEstimates of NER are not available but are likely positive for the 2017–18 and 2018–19 fishing seasons due to low TAC latency for Patagonian toothfish in both seasons. NER in the 2017–18 fishing season are likely to be lower than in the 2018–19 season because of a higher quota latency and a lower catch per longline-day compared with the previous season.

Notes: NER Net economic returns. TAC Total allowable catch.

[expand all]

26.1 Description of the fishery

Area fished

Macquarie Island is a subantarctic island about 1,500 km south of Tasmania (Figure 26.1). The island is a nature reserve in the Tasmanian reserve system and is included on the World Heritage List (UNESCO 1998). The waters within 3 nautical miles (nm) of the island are under Tasmanian jurisdiction, while waters between 3 nm and the 200 nm outer boundary of the Australian Fishing Zone are managed by the Australian Government. The south-eastern quadrant of the Macquarie Island region out to 200 nm is a marine reserve (Figure 26.1). The Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery (MITF) is outside the area covered by the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources; however, the ecosystem-based management approach used by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) has been adopted for the fishery, including comprehensive observer coverage and precautionary harvest control rules.

Fishing methods and key species

Historically, trawling was the main fishing method used in the MITF. In 2011, longlining was added as an approved fishing method (AFMA 2010). This followed a longlining trial over four seasons (2007–2010) that demonstrated longlining as an effective method for targeting Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) and showed that mitigation methods could be implemented to minimise seabird interactions with longline gear (AFMA 2010). Since the 2010–11 season, toothfish in the MITF have been solely taken using longline, except for a trial of pots in the 2013–14 fishing season. Bycatch is generally low and is regulated by a 50 t limit for any one species. The bycatch, primarily grenadier (Macrourus spp.) and violet cod (Antimora rostrata), has never exceeded the 50 t limit for any one species in a season.

Management methods

The harvest strategy for Patagonian toothfish is consistent with the guidelines of the Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy (HSP; Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2018). For Patagonian toothfish, the reference points dictate that median escapement of the spawning biomass at the end of a 35-year projection period is 50% of the median pre-exploitation level and that the probability of the spawning biomass dropping below 20% of its pre-exploitation median level is less than 10% over the projection. The total allowable catch (TAC) was previously set separately for the two main areas (Aurora Trough and Macquarie Ridge). However, based on scientific advice that it is highly likely that there is a single stock of Patagonian toothfish around Macquarie Island (see ‘Stock structure’, below), the management plan was amended in January 2012 to merge the two areas, and a single TAC is now set for the entire fishery. The MITF was recertified as sustainable by the Marine Stewardship Council in July 2017.

Fishing effort

The effort in the fishery has been consistent over time, with one or two vessels active in the fishery every year since the fishery began in 1994.

Table 26.2 Main features and statistics for the MITF
Fishery statistics a2017–18 fishing season2018–19 fishing season
Real value (2016–17)TAC
Real value (2017–18)
Patagonian toothfish450358Confidential450448Confidential
Fishery-level statistics
Effort (longline days)11295
Fishing permits2 quota SFR holders2 quota SFR holders
Active vessels11
Observer coverage b100% vessel coverage100% vessel coverage
Fishing methodsDemersal longline, demersal trawl
Primary landing portsDevonport and Hobart (Tasmania); Nelson (New Zealand)
Management methods

Input controls: limited entry, gear restrictions, closures

Output controls: TACs, ITQs

Primary markets

International: Japan, United States—frozen

Management plan

Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery Management Plan 2006 (amended 2012)

a Fishery statistics are provided by fishing season, unless otherwise indicated. The 2018–19 fishing season was 15 April 2018 – 14 April 2019. Value statistics are provided by financial year. b All vessels carry two observers on each trip; 100% of hauls are observed, but generally less than 100% of each haul.
Notes: GVP Gross value of production. ITQ Individual transferable quota. SFR Statutory fishing right. TAC Total allowable catch.

26.2 Biological status

Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides)

Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides)

Line drawing: FAO

Stock structure

The Patagonian toothfish stock at Macquarie Island is considered to be distinct from other regional toothfish populations in the Southern Ocean (Appleyard, Ward & Williams 2002). Genetic studies (for example, Appleyard, Ward & Williams 2002) and toothfish tagging programs (for example, Williams et al. 2002) indicate that a single stock exists in the MITF.

Catch history

The catch of Patagonian toothfish in the MITF (Figure 26.2) has been variable over time and generally below, but close to, the TAC. Initial catches in the fishery were relatively high but decreased from 1999 to 2003, when the Aurora Trough was effectively closed to commercial fishing, and only a single vessel was permitted to fish to maintain the tagging program and conduct experimental acoustic surveys. Catch in the 2018–19 season was just below the TAC.

FIGURE 26.2 Catch and TAC of Patagonian toothfish in the MITF, 1994–95 to 2018–19

Note: TAC Total allowable catch.
Source: AFMA

Stock assessment

The Stock Synthesis 3 software was used in 2017 to assess the Patagonian toothfish stock (Day & Hillary 2017). This integrated two-area assessment fits to tag–recapture, length composition and age-at-length data. The assessment assumes a single stock in the MITF but with spatial structuring of fishing and movement between two areas (northern and southern), with recruitment to both areas. Using this assessment, 2017 female spawning biomass was estimated at 69% of unfished levels (0.69SB0). Following the CCAMLR control rule (which uses a target of 0.50SB0 rather than 0.48SB0), a two-year TAC was calculated for the MITF for 2018–19 and 2019–20, which was robust to a wide array of catch distributions spread among the different fishing areas.

Stock status determination

The relatively high estimate of current female spawning biomass (0.69SB0) and the robust nature of the assessment result in the stock being classified as not overfished. The conservative TAC-setting process, based on applying precautionary CCAMLR control rules, and the maintenance of catch generally below the TAC result in the stock being classified as not subject to overfishing.

26.3 Economic status

Key economic trends

Latency can be variable in this fishery. In the 2018–19 fishing season, the TAC was mostly caught. It is expected that the net economic returns (NER) for the 2018–19 fishing season will be positive. The catch per longline was 4.7 t, returning to 2016–17 levels. In comparison, the 2017–18 fishing season had 20% latency and a 3.2 t catch per longline-day due to loss of gear and difficult operating conditions, which likely raised the daily cost of fishing.

The estimated biomass of 0.69SB0 in 2018 is well above the targeted level of 0.50SB0. This high abundance is likely to result in lower fishing costs and improved profitability. Given that only one operator has fished in the MITF in recent years, it is also likely that individual profit-maximising decisions are aligned with optimum use of the resource, within the constraints of the fishery’s precautionary objective.

Management arrangements

The harvest strategy for this fishery is conservative, reflecting the CCAMLR ecosystem-based management approach. Therefore, catch limits aim to maintain stock biomass at levels that are higher than recommended target reference points for other Commonwealth fisheries managed under the HSP.

Average vessel economic performance is likely to have improved since longlining was approved in 2011. The initial demersal longline trial in 2007 found a number of benefits of longline fishing compared with trawl fishing, including increased access to Patagonian toothfish in deeper waters and reduced levels of bycatch (AFMA 2010). These benefits are likely to have improved vessel-level productivity, moderating the negative effects of rough sea conditions experienced in recent years.

26.4 Environmental status

The MITF is included on the List of Exempt Native Specimens under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and has export approval until 9 October 2026. No additional recommendations apply under this exemption, beyond standard recommendations pertaining to reporting.

The ecological risk assessment process was completed to level 3 (Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects) for trawling, because longlining had not yet commenced in the fishery (AFMA 2007). A further assessment determined that no species was at high risk from trawling in the MITF (Zhou, Fuller & Smith 2009).

The level 3 assessment for demersal longlining used data from 2007 to 2010 and is considered preliminary (Zhou & Fuller 2011). Two species—southern lanternshark (Etmopterus baxteri) and southern sleeper shark (Somniosus antarcticus)—had mean fishing mortality estimated to be slightly higher than the rates corresponding to the maximum number of fish that can be removed in the long term. However, the authors suggested that the level 3 assessment tends to be overly precautionary, and it is likely that the mortality rate was overestimated. This is supported by the low recorded catch for the two species (two southern lantern sharks and nine southern sleeper sharks) over the three years. Further analyses should take place as data become available.

The MITF ecological risk management reports for trawling and demersal longline both outline how the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) will continue to monitor bycatch, and interactions with species protected under the EPBC Act, in a manner consistent with CCAMLR principles (AFMA 2010, 2011). AFMA has developed a revised ecological risk assessment framework and is undertaking new assessments under this framework. It is expected that the new assessment framework will be applied to the MITF.

All the catch in the MITF is now taken by longline. AFMA publishes quarterly logbook reports of interactions with species protected under the EPBC Act on its website. In 2018, 12 interactions with porbeagles (Lamna nasus) were recorded. Five were released alive, six were dead and one was in an unknown condition.

26.5 References

AFMA 2007, Ecological risk management: report for the Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery—demersal trawl sub-fishery, Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra.

—— 2010, Assessment of longline fishing in the Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery, AFMA, Canberra.

—— 2011, Ecological risk management: report for the Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery—demersal longline sub-fishery, AFMA, Canberra.

Appleyard, SA, Ward, RD & Williams, R 2002, ‘Population structure of Patagonian toothfish around Heard, McDonald and Macquarie Islands’, Antarctic Science, vol. 14, pp. 364–73.

Day, J & Hillary, R 2017, Stock assessment of the Macquarie Island fishery for Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), using data up to and including August 2016, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart.

Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2018, Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra.

UNESCO 1998, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, twenty-first session of the World Heritage Committee, 1–6 December 1997, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Naples, Italy.

Williams, R, Tuck, GN, Constable, AJ & Lamb, T 2002, ‘Movement, growth and available abundance to the fishery of Dissostichus eleginoides Smitt, 1898 at Heard Island, derived from tagging experiments’, CCAMLR Science, vol. 9, pp. 33–48.

Zhou, S & Fuller, M 2011, Sustainability assessment for fishing effects on fish bycatch species in the Macquarie Island Toothfish Longline Fishery: 2007–2010, report to AFMA, Canberra.

——, Fuller, M & Smith, T 2009, Rapid quantitative risk assessment for fish species in seven Commonwealth fisheries, report to AFMA, Canberra.

Fishing at Macquarie Island
Australian Longline Pty

Last reviewed: 4 November 2019
Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

Please verify that you are not a robot.