Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery
Chapter 23: Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery
H Patterson, A Williams, B Hennecke and D Mobsby
FIGURE 23.1 Purse-seine effort and longline catch in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery, 2018
Note: SBT Southern bluefin tuna.
|Fishing mortality||Biomass||Fishing mortality||Biomass|
|Southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii)||Not subject to overfishing||Overfished||Not subject to overfishing||Overfished||The estimate of spawning biomass is below 20% of unfished biomass. The global TAC, set in line with the management procedure, should allow rebuilding within the prescribed time frame.|
|Economic status||NER are expected to have remained positive in 2017–18, reflecting low levels of quota latency. However, the overfished status of the stock poses a risk to future NER. Economic status will improve as the stock is rebuilt under the management procedure.|
a The global assessment of southern bluefin tuna and the default limit reference point from the Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy (Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2018) are used as the basis for status determination.
Notes: NER Net economic returns. TAC Total allowable catch.
23.1 Description of the fishery
The Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery (SBTF) spans the Australian Fishing Zone. Southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) is targeted by fishing fleets from a number of nations, both on the high seas and within the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia and South Africa. Young fish (1–4 years of age) move from the spawning ground in the north-east Indian Ocean into the Australian EEZ and southwards along the Western Australian coast (Figure 23.1). Surface-schooling juveniles are found seasonally in the continental-shelf region of southern Australia. Current evidence suggests that juveniles return to the Great Australian Bight in the austral summer, but there is some uncertainty about the proportion that returns (Basson et al. 2012). Most of the Australian catch is taken in the Great Australian Bight. Smaller amounts are taken from the longline fisheries, mainly off south-eastern Australia.
Since 1992, most of the Australian catch has been taken by purse seine, targeting juvenile southern bluefin tuna (2–5 years of age) in the Great Australian Bight. This catch is transferred to aquaculture farming operations off the coast of Port Lincoln in South Australia, where the fish are grown to a larger size to achieve higher market prices. Australian domestic longliners operating along the east coast catch some southern bluefin tuna, and recreational fishing for the species has increased in recent years. Throughout the rest of its range, southern bluefin tuna is targeted by pelagic longliners from other fishing nations.
The Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy (Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2018) is not prescribed for fisheries managed jointly under international management arrangements, such as the SBTF, which is managed under the 1994 Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna. In 2011, the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT) adopted a management procedure (the Bali Procedure) that is analogous to a harvest strategy, and this has been used to set the global total allowable catch (TAC) since 2012. The management procedure aims to achieve rebuilding of the southern bluefin tuna stock to 20% of its initial unfished biomass (the interim rebuilding target) by 2035, with 70% probability. The global TAC is allocated to members and cooperating non-members as agreed by the CCSBT under the 2011 CCSBT Resolution on the Allocation of the Global Total Allowable Catch. The Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) sets the TAC for the SBTF in accordance with Australia’s allocation. A new management procedure is currently being developed.
The CCSBT has noted that levels of unaccounted mortality may be substantial in the global fishery. A high level of unaccounted mortality may constitute exceptional circumstances because it was not taken into consideration when the management procedure was developed. The CCSBT has agreed to a definition of attributable mortality, and members have agreed to manage all sources of mortality within their national allocations. The CCSBT is also working to better account for non-member catch.
Most of the Australian fishing effort for southern bluefin tuna is by purse-seine vessels in the Great Australian Bight and waters off South Australia. The number of vessels in the purse-seine fishery has been fairly stable, ranging from five to eight since the 1994–95 fishing season. Since 2011, most fishing has occurred in the east of the Bight, closer to Port Lincoln, resulting in shorter towing distances to bring the fish to the aquaculture grow-out cages.
The number of longline vessels fishing for southern bluefin tuna off the east coast of Australia has been more variable, ranging from 11 to 24 vessels during the past 10 years. Effort in the longline sector is largely dependent on available quota.
The reported global catch of southern bluefin tuna has declined since the peak catches in the early 1960s, and has been fairly stable since the mid 2000s. The Australian catch and TAC were stable from 1990 to 2009 and were then reduced as part of a global reduction in catch. Since adoption of the management procedure in 2011, the global TAC has increased.
Fishery statistics a
2016–17 fishing season
2017–18 fishing season
Purse seine: 1,004 search-hours; 112 shots
Purse seine: 1,137 search-hours; 198 shots
85 SFR owners initially allocated
84 SFR owners initially allocated
Purse seine: 6
Purse seine: 7
Observer coverage f
Purse seine: 20 shots (18.3%)
Purse seine: 40 shots (20.9%)
Purse seine, pelagic longline, minor line (troll and poling)
Primary landing ports
Port Lincoln (South Australia)
Output controls: TAC, ITQs, area restrictions to control incidental catches in the longline fishery
International: Japan—fresh, frozen
Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery Management Plan 1995
a Fishery statistics are provided by fishing season, unless otherwise indicated. Season is 1 December – 30 November. Value statistics are by financial year.b Australia carried forward ~32 t of undercatch to the 2016–17 TAC.
c Australia carried forward ~363 t of undercatch to the 2017–18 TAC. The TAC set by the AFMA Commission was 6,165 t. d Includes some minor-line catch.
e Effort only for where southern bluefin tuna was caught.
f Longline observer coverage is provided by calendar year, and includes hooks observed only by the electronic monitoring system.
Notes: ETBF Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery. GVP Gross value of production. ITQ Individual transferable quota. SFR Statutory fishing right. TAC Total allowable catch. WTBF Western Tuna and Billfish Fishery. Not applicable.
Southern bluefin tuna with catch documentation scheme tag
Matt Daniel, AFMA
23.2 Biological status
Southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii)
Line drawing: FAO
Southern bluefin tuna constitutes a single, highly migratory stock that spawns in the north-east Indian Ocean (off north-western Australia, south of Indonesia; Figure 23.1) and migrates throughout the temperate southern oceans.
Troll catches of southern bluefin tuna off the east coast of Australia were reported as early as the 1920s, but significant commercial fishing for southern bluefin tuna commenced in the early 1950s with the establishment of a pole-and-live-bait fishery off New South Wales, South Australia and, later (1970), Western Australia. Purse-seine gear overtook pole as the main fishing method, and catches peaked at 21,500 t in 1982. Australia’s catch of southern bluefin tuna was relatively stable from 1989 to 2009, when the global TAC and Australia’s TAC were reduced because of the poor state of the biological stock (Figure 23.2). However, the TAC has been slowly increasing with the implementation of the management procedure in 2011. Reported global catch peaked in the early 1960s at more than 80,000 t, before declining steadily until around 2007 (Figure 23.3).
Recreational angling for southern bluefin tuna in Australia has been popular among game fishers for many years, and activity among the general recreational fishing sector has increased in recent years (for example, Rowsell et al. 2008). At present, limited data are available on the recreational catch of southern bluefin tuna, and no total estimate of the national recreational catch is available. Several state surveys have taken place; however, the error associated with these surveys has been estimated to be as high as 47% (Giri & Hall 2015). In 2015, a report on methods to estimate recreational catch of southern bluefin tuna was released (Moore et al. 2015). A national survey, based on this methodology, began in December 2018.
Note: Total global catches exceeded reported global catches between 1995 and 2005; some scientists estimate that unreported catches surpassed 178,000 t during this period (Polacheck & Davies 2008).
The management procedure specifies that a full quantitative stock assessment should be undertaken every three years. In 2017, a revised CCSBT operating model (the quantitative model that is used to assess the spawning biomass of southern bluefin tuna, based on a variety of data sources) was used to run various scenarios to determine the impact of fishing on the stock (CCSBT 2017). The updated assessment incorporated the new half-sibling pair data from a close-kin genetic study, as well as parent–offspring pair data, which add to the data included in the previous assessment (Bravington, Grewe & Davies 2014). The 2011 assessment reported the estimated biomass of southern bluefin tuna 10 years and older (B10+) as a proxy for spawning biomass, whereas the 2014 assessment provided a revised estimate of spawning biomass that includes younger fish. The 2017 assessment used a new estimation of total reproductive output instead of B10+, although B10+ is still provided for comparison because the interim rebuilding target is defined in terms of B10+.
The 2017 assessment examined a range of sensitivities, including scenarios for unaccounted catch mortalities. The CCSBT Extended Scientific Committee noted that the 2017 assessment was constrained by the lack of information on sources of unaccounted mortalities, and so the ‘added catch’ sensitivity used in 2014 could be a plausible scenario. However, in contrast to the 2014 assessment, the unaccounted mortality scenarios in the 2017 assessment did not reduce the probability of the stock recovering to 20% of the unfished level by 2035 below the prescribed 70% probability.
The reference set of operating models (or base case) for the assessment indicated that the spawning stock biomass remains below the interim target of 20% of the unfished level. Spawning stock biomass (using the total reproductive output method) was estimated at 13% of the initial unfished level (80% confidence interval [CI] 11–17%) and below the level needed to produce the maximum sustainable yield (MSY; CCSBT 2017). The spawning stock biomass of the B10+ group was estimated to be 11% of unfished levels (80% CI 9–13%); the 2014 estimate was 7% of unfished levels (CCSBT 2014). The ratio of current fishing mortality to the level associated with MSY (FMSY) was 0.50 (range 0.38–0.66).
Stock status determination
The current mean estimate for spawning stock biomass of southern bluefin tuna is 13% of unfished levels. As a result, the stock remains classified as overfished.
The global TAC for 2017 was set based on the outputs from the management procedure, which should result in a level of fishing mortality that facilitates rebuilding of the stock. The reference case for the updated assessment indicates reduced fishing mortality from that estimated in the 2014 assessment. Substantial uncertainty remains about the level of unaccounted catch mortality. However, unlike in the previous assessment, the unaccounted mortality scenarios in the 2017 assessment did not reduce the probability of the stock recovering by the designated time of 2035. In addition, the outlook for the stock appears more positive, with signs of increased recruitment in recent years and projections under the current management procedure of the stock reaching the interim rebuilding target before 2035. Although caution is warranted and increased recruitment does not indicate increased stock biomass, the outlook for the stock has improved since the 2014 assessment. Given the decrease in fishing mortality noted in the assessment and the fact that the unaccounted mortality scenarios do not impede the probability of recovery, the stock is classified as not subject to overfishing. However, future assessments may change the outlook for the stock and will need to be monitored, as will future estimates of unaccounted mortality.
23.3 Economic status
Key economic trends
Assessment of economic performance in the wild-catch sector is complicated by the vertical integration of the wild-catch and aquaculture sectors. As noted above, most southern bluefin tuna caught are transferred to aquaculture farms off Port Lincoln. The beach price paid for live fish at the point of transfer to these farms cannot be determined, because operators are generally involved in both wild-catch and aquaculture operations. Therefore, beach prices in the fishery are estimated with reference to export unit values and costs incurred during the aquaculture phase.
In 2017–18, the gross value of production for the SBTF—the combined value of the catch at the point of transfer to farming pens and catch sold direct into global markets—is estimated to have increased by 3% to $39.7 million (Figure 23.4). The increase in production value was driven by higher catch resulting from an increase in the TAC in the 2017–18 fishing season. The increase in catch volume consisted of more southern bluefin tuna being transferred into aquaculture farms. Despite an increase in farm input in 2017–18, a generally declining share of southern bluefin tuna has been ranched in recent years. Conversely, there has been an increase in catch from eastern Australia (predominantly caught by the Commonwealth Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery fleet). It is uncertain whether this represents a long-term shift in the pattern of catch in the fishery.
The average price for southern bluefin tuna declined by 3% in 2017–18. There has also been a longer-run decline in southern bluefin tuna prices. Between 2001–02 and 2017–18, the total production value of the SBTF declined by nearly two-thirds in real terms. This was the result of prices falling from an average of $20.3 per kilogram (in 2017–18 dollars) in 2001–02 to $6.77 per kilogram in 2017–18; most of the decline in price occurred from 2001–02 to 2009–10. Since then, prices have been more stable, although lower. For exports, the value of southern bluefin tuna nearly halved in real terms between 2007–08 and 2017–18, which was the result of a decline in unit export prices (Figure 23.5). Australia’s southern bluefin tuna industry is highly export oriented, and the decline in price is the result of a number of related factors, including changes in the Australian dollar – Japanese yen exchange rate, falling demand for sashimi tuna in Japan and growth of global bluefin tuna aquaculture production.
Southern bluefin tuna pens
Matt Daniel, AFMA
Note: ‘Real’ indicates that value has been adjusted for inflation.
The Australian TAC is allocated primarily to holders of statutory fishing rights in the fishery through individual transferable quotas (ITQs). The ITQs give fishers flexibility to use input combinations that result in the most efficient operation. Theoretically, transferability of ITQs between fishers also allows the catch to be taken by the most efficient operators in the fishery, since quota is expected to gravitate to the most efficient operators. However, other factors are often considered by quota holders when deciding to lease or sell quota, sometimes resulting in quota not being allocated to the most efficient user. This may limit quota transaction activity between the purse-seine operators and longline operators in some years.
Performance against economic objective
The SBTF typically has very little quota latency within a fishing season, indicating that net economic returns (NER) are likely to be positive. The SBTF is a high-value fishery, and analysis of recent economic trends suggests that the fishery remains profitable. However, given the biological status of the southern bluefin tuna stock, it is likely that a proportion of historical profits have been generated by unsustainable global harvest levels. Furthermore, the low biomass level of the stock poses a risk to the future flow of NER from this fishery. Rebuilding of the southern bluefin tuna stock under the current management arrangements would be considered an improvement in the fishery’s economic status. The importance of rebuilding the southern bluefin tuna stock is reinforced by the persistence of generally lower southern bluefin tuna prices and the growth in global bluefin tuna aquaculture production in recent years.
23.4 Environmental status
The SBTF has approval for export until 13 December 2019. Conditions placed on the export approval include increasing confidence in the estimates of purse-seine catches, and that the management arrangements start accounting for Australia’s attributable catch, including recreational and Indigenous catch, by 2018.
A level 3 ecological risk assessment (Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects) of 83 non-target species (6 chondrichthyans and 77 teleosts) to determine the impact of southern bluefin tuna fishing on these species assessed the risk as low (Zhou, Fuller & Smith 2009). The priority of the ecological risk management report is to respond to interactions with protected species (AFMA 2009).
No interactions with protected species were reported for the SBTF in 2018. Interactions with sharks and other protected species using longline gear are discussed in Chapters 21 and 24.
AFMA 2009, Ecological risk management report for the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery, Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra.
Basson, M, Hobday, AJ, Eveson, JP & Patterson, TA 2012, Spatial interactions among juvenile southern bluefin tuna at the global scale: a large scale archival tag experiment, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation report 2003/002, CSIRO, Hobart.
Bravington, MV, Grewe, PG & Davies, CR 2014, Fishery-independent estimate of spawning biomass of southern bluefin tuna through identification of close-kin using genetic markers, FRDC report 2007/034, CSIRO, Hobart.
CCSBT 2014, Report of the nineteenth meeting of the Scientific Committee, Auckland, New Zealand, 1–6 September 2014, Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Canberra.
—— 2017, Report of the twenty second meeting of the Scientific Committee, Yogyyakarta, Indonesia, 28 August – 2 September 2017, CCSBT, Canberra.
Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2018, Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra.
Giri, K & Hall, K 2015, South Australian recreational fishing survey, Fisheries Victoria internal report series 62, Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Melbourne.
Moore, A, Hall, K, Khageswor, G, Tracey, S, Hansen, S, Ward, P, Stobutzki, I, Andrews, J, Nicol, S & Brown, P 2015, Developing robust and cost-effective methods for estimating the national recreational catch of southern bluefin tuna in Australia, FRDC report 2012/022.20, ABARES, Canberra.
Polacheck, T & Davies, C 2008, Consideration of implications of large unreported catches of southern bluefin tuna for assessments of tropical tunas, and the need for independent verification of catch and effort statistics, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research paper 023, CSIRO, Hobart.
Rowsell, M, Moore, A, Sahlqvist, P & Begg, G 2008, Estimating Australia’s recreational catch of southern bluefin tuna, working paper CCSBT-ESC/0809/17, 13th meeting of the Scientific Committee of the CCSBT, Rotorua, New Zealand, September 2008.
Zhou, S, Fuller, M & Smith, T 2009, Rapid quantitative risk assessment for fish species in seven Commonwealth fisheries, report for AFMA, Canberra.
Southern bluefin tuna
Matt Daniel, AFMA