Authorised Officer Audit and Performance Standards
Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, April 2018
This document outlines the policy for auditing external Plant Exports Authorised Officers and presents the performance standards against which they will be assessed. The overarching audit framework and principles of the Plant Export Operations branch are outlined in the Plant Export Operations Audit Policy.
|Authorised Officer Audit and Performance Standards PDF||13||265 KB|
If you have difficulty accessing these files, visit web accessibility for assistance.
Below is a table of terms and definitions used within this document.
|Active||An Authorised Officer is considered ‘active’ when they have completed at least one export activity since their most recent audit or competency assessment.|
|Audit schedule||The frequency with which an Authorised Officer is audited by a departmental auditor.|
|Audit Services Group||The service delivery stream of the department responsible for conducting audit activities.|
|Audit Services Group Manager||The operations manager within the Audit Services Group who has the service delivery responsibilities for the audit of Authorised Officers.|
|Audit Services Group Program Integration, Assurance and Capability||This refers to the team responsible for managing the auditor and audit framework, including the provision of technical advice, auditor competency and mentoring. This team is also responsible for escalating audit outcomes where sanctions are applied.|
|Authorised Officer||A person appointed under section 20 of the Export Control Act 1982 to conduct export activities on behalf of the department.|
|Authorised Officer Program||The program responsible for the administration and oversight of Plant Export Authorised Officers such as training and appointment, maintaining contact details and managing inactive Authorised Officers.|
|Compliance audit||An audit of an Authorised Officer which relies primarily on documentation completed by the Authorised Officer as the basis for determining compliance with legislative and departmental requirements. The Authorised Officer is interviewed by the departmental auditor in respect to this documentation, during which time the Authorised Officer’s export activities are discussed.|
|Deed of Obligations||A document signed by an Authorised Officer, prior to their appointment, outlining their obligations to the department and verifying that the Authorised Officer acknowledges and commits to these obligations.|
|Delegate||The individual within the department delegated power by the Secretary under Section 20 of the Export Control Act 1982 to appoint and revoke Authorised Officers.|
|Demonstration audit||An audit of an Authorised Officer which relies primarily on physical observation of activities, in addition to documentation completed by the Authorised Officer, as the basis for determining the Authorised Officer’s compliance with legislative and departmental requirements. The Authorised Officer is interviewed by the departmental auditor in respect to the physical observation and this documentation, during which time the Authorised Officer’s export activities are discussed.|
|Departmental auditor||A departmental officer recognised under section 45.5 of the Export Control (Plants and Plant Products) Order 2011 to conduct an audit of the work of an Authorised Officer.|
|External Authorised Officer||An Authorised Officer not employed by the department.|
|Inactive||An Authorised Officer is considered ‘inactive’ when they have not completed at least one export activity since their most recent audit or competency assessment.|
|Instrument of Appointment||This document appoints a person appointed as an Authorised Officer under the Export Control Act 1982 and provides them with the necessary powers under the Export Control (Plants and Plant Products) Order 2011 to undertake the tasks required of them as an Authorised Officer.|
|Periodic audit||Audits which are scheduled and coordinated in conjunction with the Authorised Officer being audited. Follows the audit schedule. The Authorised Officer is advised in advance that the audit will take place.|
|Plant Export Assessor||A departmental officer responsible for organising and delivering training and conducting competency assessments of Authorised Officers.|
|Protocol job function||Authorised Officer job functions required to conduct export activities for commodities to protocol markets.|
|Protocol market||A combination of commodities and destination countries which have complex importing country requirements. The protocols are government to government agreements that identify specific quarantine pests of concern to the importing country and the phytosanitary measures or treatments that will be accepted to address these pests to allow trade to occur. A complete list of protocol markets can be found in Reference: Table of horticulture protocol markets.|
|Unannounced audit||An audit conducted with little to no prior notice to the Authorised Officer. Unannounced audits can be triggered by a catalyst and may deviate from the Authorised Officer’s existing audit schedule. Section 45.3 of the Export Control (Plants and Plant Products) Order 2011 provides the authority to conduct unannounced audits.|
In order to manage phytosanitary risks, and as party to international obligations which aim to protect plant health, the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources regulates the export of plants and plant products. The regulatory requirements for external Authorised Officers (AOs) involved in the export of prescribed plants and plant products are contained within legislation, the AO Instrument of Appointment, the AO Deed of Obligations, the Plant Export Operations Manual (the Manual), and instructional material.
For the purpose of business assurance, AOs involved in the inspection of prescribed plants and plant products are subject to audits conducted by the department’s Audit Services Group (AuSG). The department’s power to undertake AO audits proceeds from section 45 of the Export Control (Plants and Plant Products) Order 2011 and section 4.5 of the AO Deed of Obligations.
The objective of an AO audit is to assess an AO’s compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements. AOs are audited against a set of performance standards which Plant Export Operations have derived from the regulatory requirements described above.
AOs that do not meet the performance standards will be subject to sanctions, including reduced timeframes between audits, additional training, and possible revocation of appointment by the Delegate. In addition to providing business assurance to the department, AO audits provide feedback to improve both service delivery and training and instructional material.
4. Audit program
AOs are subject to both periodic and unannounced audits by departmental auditors (auditors). Unannounced audits can be initiated by, but not limited to:
- serious or repeated non-compliance
- documentation anomalies
- anomalies in activity patterns or throughput
- overseas consignment rejections
- credible information received by the department.
4.2 Audit type
An AO may receive either a compliance audit or a demonstration audit. Both the compliance and demonstration audit types can be performed either periodically or unannounced and follow the same process (see item 4.4). Additionally, demonstration audits will involve observation of an AO performing their export activities.
4.2.1 Compliance Audit
A compliance audit can take place at a registered establishment, a business office, a departmental office, or other location approved by the AuSG Manager.
The AO’s documents are directly checked against the performance standards to determine whether the AO has been operating in accordance with departmental requirements and procedures. These documents and their findings will guide the interview between the auditor and the AO. An auditor may require an AO to demonstrate their skills and knowledge for one or more checklist items ( e.g. by demonstrating that the most current work instructions are in their possession, demonstrating knowledge of flow path inspection procedures etc .). This may be where the auditor is not satisfied with the initial response provided by the AO and further clarification is required to assess compliance. Where the auditor identifies multiple checklist items for the AO to demonstrate, the auditor has the discretion to make a compliance audit become a demonstration audit.
4.2.2 Demonstration Audit
A demonstration audit must take place at a registered establishment or an area that an auditor deems suitable, where the physical demonstration component will be conducted.
A demonstration audit will require the AO to perform export activities for the job functions against which they are being audited, while the auditor assesses the AO’s compliance with the performance standards through documentation checks and physical observation. The auditor may ask the AO follow-up questions during this component of the audit if more thorough checking of the AO’s skills and knowledge is required to assess compliance with performance standards.
4.3 Audit Prerequisite (Activity)
Only active AOs can receive an audit. Where an audit falls due for an AO who is not active (inactive), their audit will be scheduled for the following quarter. This policy continues to apply unless an AO has been inactive for twelve months or more. AOs who are inactive for twelve months will be referred to the Authorised Officer Program (AOP).
4.4 The Audit Procedure
AOs will be contacted by a departmental auditor to schedule periodic audits via the contact details they have provided to AOP. It is an AO’s responsibility to provide up to date contact details with the department. It is a condition of their appointment that AOs make themselves available for audit by the department. Unannounced audits occur with little or no prior notice and therefore may not involve AOs receiving prior contact from a departmental auditor.
Upon being contacted by an auditor, an AO must make reasonable efforts to commit to an audit. AOs who avoid committing to an audit are failing to meet their obligations under the Deed of Obligations, and may be referred to the Delegate and/or risk revocation (see item 5.6).
During the documentation check, the auditor will review AO export documentation against the job functions being audited. For each of the job functions being audited, auditors will typically review three sets of export documentation, paying special attention to errors and anomalies. A number of these documents, and any errors and anomalies identified within, will be used in the interview component of the audit.
The audit of an AO will focus on one or more of the AO’s job functions. In instances where an AO has multiple job functions and not all can be audited by the auditor, the department will utilise a job function hierarchy to prioritise resources towards auditing more high risk job functions, such as those with more complex inspection and sampling techniques. This is in line with the department’s compliance model which targets higher assurance services to operations with higher risk of non-compliance.
When the auditor meets with the AO they will conduct an entry meeting, which is used to outline the objectives, scope and process of the audit. During the entry meeting, the auditor will outline the scope of the audit (for example, whether the audit is a compliance or demonstration audit and which job functions are included) and the process that will be followed.
Interview and discussion
After reviewing an AO’s documentation, the auditor will have a discussion with the AO and, if a demonstration audit (see item 4.2), observe the AO conducting export activities. During the discussion, an AO’s skills and knowledge are checked against departmental performance standards (see item 4.7). Auditors may also take note of the AO’s attitude towards the department and that their actions are in accordance with the requirements of their Deed of Obligations (including the APS Values and the APS Code of Conduct), which may be considered when issuing Corrective Action Requests (CARs) and determining audit outcomes. An AO’s documents (those which were reviewed in the documentation check) are used as a reference when checking an AO’s skills and knowledge.
For demonstration audits, the auditor will ask the AO to perform export activities for the job functions against which they are being audited, while the auditor assesses the AO’s compliance with the performance standards through documentation checks and physical observation.
The discussion concludes with an exit meeting. This time is used to present the audit findings, address non-compliance, issue CARs and explain any future actions to the AO.
4.5 Audit Schedule
AOs are scheduled for audit based on whether they hold protocol job functions.
4.5.1 AOs without protocol job functions
Newly appointed AOs who do not hold protocol job functions will be audited to the following schedule:
- First audit: demonstration audit within 6 months of appointment.
- Subsequent audits: either a compliance or demonstration audit, scheduled according to audit outcomes, at a minimum of one every 12 months.
Existing AOs who do not hold protocol job functions will have either a compliance or demonstration audit in line with their existing audit schedule, as per step 2 above. For AOs operating in seasonal industries, the timeframe for the audit may be adjusted to take into account the length of the operating season by moving the audit earlier or later.
4.5.2 AOs with Protocol job functions
Newly appointed AOs with protocol job function, or existing AOs who become appointed for new protocol job functions will be audited to the following schedule:
- First audit: demonstration audit covering the protocol job function, within the first season of that commodity.
- Second audit: demonstration audit covering appointed job functions not addressed in the first audit. Scheduled according to outcome of the first audit (see item 5.4).
- Subsequent audit: demonstration audits prioritising job functions according to the department’s job function hierarchy, scheduled according to audit outcomes at a minimum of one every 12 months. This scheduling may be adjusted to take into account operating season and multiple audits may occur within one operating season where required.
- New protocol job functions: AOs will return to the initial audit schedule (point 1) where they are appointed for a new protocol job function.
Existing AOs with protocol job functions will be subject to ongoing audits as per point 3 above, unless they are appointed for new job functions.
These timeframes may be adjusted to accommodate the operating season, by moving the audit earlier or later.
AOs with protocol job functions will be subject to a demonstration audit in all of their periodic audits. These AOs may be subject to a compliance or a demonstration audit in the case of unannounced audits.
4.6 Fees and Charges
Compliance activities of AOs, including audits, follow up to CARs and mandatory training are currently subject to fee for service. Cancellation fees may apply where an AO cancels a scheduled audit. Details of these charges can be found in the Charging guidelines on the department’s website.
4.7 Performance Standards
AOs are assessed for compliance against a set of performance standards. These performance standards are derived from relevant legislation, the Instrument of Appointment, the Deed of Obligations, the Manual and departmental work instructions, and are a tool to determine an AO’s compliance with these documents. The AO audit performance standards are contained in item 6 of this document.
The performance standards are organised into six groupings known as activities. The six activities are:
- Inspection of prescribed goods
- Inspection of bulk vessels
- Protocol and importing country requirements
Within each of these activities, related performance standards are further organised into checklist items. To ensure that AOs are assessed comprehensively and consistently, an AO audit covers all activities. The order in which the checklist items (and the performance standards contained within) are presented during an audit, follows the work flow of typical AO activities. Item 6 of this document presents the checklist items and performance standards covered during an AO audit.
5. Audit outcomes
5.1 Determining an AO’s Compliance
During an audit, if an AO is found to be compliant against all of the applicable performance standards contained within a checklist item, then the checklist item is rated as ‘compliant’ (C).
If the AO is found to be non-compliant against any of the applicable performance standards contained within a checklist item, then the checklist item is rated as ‘non-compliant’ (NC). Auditors will record details of all non-compliance found during an AO audit.
If a checklist item doesn’t apply to an AO’s appointed job functions, then the checklist item is ‘not-rated’ (NR). For example, this may be a checklist item which specifically applies to the inspection of bulk vessels where an AO is not appointed for the inspection of bulk vessels.
5.2 Corrective Action Requests (CARs)
Where an AO is rated as ‘non-compliant’ against a performance standard, the auditor will issue a CAR. CARs will be issued for each non-compliant checklist item.
Each CAR will describe the identified non-compliance, and detail the pathways through which the non-compliance can be satisfactorily addressed (closed out). Minor and major CARs require an AO to address non-compliance issues so as to prevent their recurrence. Critical CARs are considered so serious that traditional closeout pathways are insufficient and so the matter must be referred to PIAC or the Delegate to decide on future action. Additionally, the AO must acknowledge the CAR, including signing and either declaring that they accept or don’t accept the CAR.
CARs are categorised as either minor, major or critical to reflect the seriousness of the underlying non-compliance and the threat it poses to departmental objectives. A major CAR will be given greater weight by auditors in determining the outcome of an audit (next audit timeframe, mandatory training or referral to the AuSG’s Program Integration, Assurance and Capability (PIAC) team) than a minor CAR.
- A minor non-compliance is considered to be ‘an inadvertent action or contravention of departmental requirements that has not affected the export of compliant prescribed goods’.
- A major non-compliance is considered to be ‘a deliberate/inadvertent action or contravention of departmental requirements that results in a situation that has/may lead to the export of prescribed goods that are not export compliant’.
- A critical non-compliance is a contravention of departmental requirements so serious that an auditor judges traditional close-out pathways are insufficient, or which may impact on market access. A critical non-compliance is to be referred to PIAC, and potentially the Delegate, to decide on future action (see item 5.6).
CARs are issued in writing by auditors immediately upon completing the audit. CARs can be closed out through one of four pathways:
- Minor CARs may be closed out immediately. An auditor does not need to observe the AO addressing the non-compliance in practice to close out a minor CAR immediately. However, the auditor must be confident that the AO understands the non-compliance, and possesses the appropriate skills, knowledge and tools to prevent a recurrence. To assist the AO to improve, the auditor may provide advice, clarify instructional materials, or direct the AO to instructional materials.
- The CAR may be closed out at a later date, after the non-compliance is observed to be addressed in practice. Where appropriate, this observation may occur remotely (for example, the AO may email evidence of their corrective action). The auditor must be confident the AO understands the non-compliance, and possesses the appropriate skills, knowledge and tools to prevent a recurrence. To assist the AO to improve, the auditor may provide advice, clarify instructional materials, or direct the AO to instructional materials. The timeframe for closing out a CAR at a later date should be no longer than 28 calendar days. Extensions for additional periods may be granted at the discretion of the AuSG Manager.
- Mandatory training by a Plant Export Assessor (PEA) may be required if an auditor determines that an AO lacks the required skills or knowledge to prevent a recurrence of the non-compliance, and is not confident that any assistance given (advice, clarification of instructional materials, or direction to instructional materials) is sufficient to prevent a recurrence (see item 5.3). The CAR will be closed out once training has been completed.
- Only critical CARs are closed out by referral to PIAC. Once the auditor has referred the CAR to PIAC, the auditor is no longer responsible for responding to the AO’s non-compliance. PIAC will then either decide how to respond on a case-by-case basis; or refer the critical non-compliance to the Plant Export Operations branch and/or the delegate for sanctioning.
CARs that cannot be closed out will be referred to PIAC to determine future action (see item 5.6).
5.3 Mandatory Training
Post-audit training may be conducted by a PEA following the issuance of a CAR, or where the Delegate considers it appropriate (see item 5.6). This training will focus directly on non-compliance found at audit and are subject to fee for service (see item 4.6). The department will organise and prioritise these training sessions to minimise the risk of non-compliance whilst the AO continues to conduct inspections. An AO must make reasonable efforts to commit to mandatory training. AOs who avoid committing to mandatory training are failing to meet their obligations under the Deed of Obligations, and may be subject to revocation of appointment by the Delegate (see item 5.7).
5.4 Audit Timeframes
AOs who are issued CARs may have the timeframe for their next periodic audit reduced from 12 months to 6 or 3 months. A reduced timeframe allows the department to more closely monitor the AO’s performance, and to provide additional support to the AO. Next audit timeframes of 3 or 6 months may require rescheduling to within the same season to accommodate protocol job functions, which are heavily seasonal dependent. Table 1 details the relationship between the numbers of major and minor CARs issued and the timeframe for the AO’s next periodic audit.
|Number of minor CARs issued|
|Number of major CARs issued||0||Next audit in 12 months/next season||Next audit in 12 months/next season||Next audit in 12 months/next season||Next audit in 6 months||Next audit in 3 months|
|1||Next audit in 6 months||Next audit in 6 months||Next audit in 3 months||Next audit in 3 months||Refer to PIAC|
|2||Next audit in 3 months||Refer to PIAC||Refer to PIAC||Refer to PIAC||Refer to PIAC|
Any combination of CARs that exceed those in the table will default in a referral to PIAC.
5.5 Audit Report
An auditor will produce a report upon completion of the audit. The report will be submitted to the AO at the audit exit meeting, or within 10 working days of completion. This audit report will summarise audit findings, including non-compliance, CARs, observations, and future action. An AO may be required to present previous audit report(s) when applying for reappointment.
5.6 Refer to PIAC/Delegate
Where an auditor issues a critical CAR, the audit result along with the CAR will be referred to PIAC, who will determine how to escalate the issue. PIAC may refer the matter to the AOP, the Business Systems Program and/or the Delegate to decide on future action. Instances where PIAC may refer the matter include where the:
- AO fails to meet their obligations under the Deed of Obligations (including avoiding audits)
- AO has been intentionally non-compliant, fraudulent or corrupt
- AO has been repeatedly non-compliant in related incidents
- CARs are not closed out to the satisfaction of the auditor/Delegate.
Future action to address the non-compliance and audit result is at the discretion of PIAC/Delegate, which may include, but is not limited to:
- the issuance of major CARs
- a timeframe for the AO’s next periodic audit of 3 months
- mandatory training (see item 5.3)
- revocation of appointment by the Delegate (see item 5.7)
- referral to the department’s Investigations and Enforcement program.
5.7 Revocation of Appointment by the Delegate
AO non-compliance may constitute grounds for the revocation of an AO’s appointment without liability to the department.
The first step in revocation is the provision of a written ‘notice of intention to consider revocation’ from the Delegate to the AO. This notice of intention provides the AO the opportunity to submit reasons as to why their appointment should not be revoked. Following submissions from the AO, the Delegate may or may not decide to revoke the appointment. If the AO’s appointment is not revoked, then the AO’s continuing appointment may be subject to conditions, with failure to comply with these conditions resulting in the revocation of the appointment.
5.8 Reappointment of AOs
To be eligible for reappointment, AOs must be audited as per the schedule appropriate for their job functions, and have no outstanding CARs or mandatory training requirements.
6. Performance standards
Activity 1: Legislation
|1. Checklist items||Performance Standards|
|1.1 Legislation, obligations and administrative instruments|
|1.2 Awareness of Work Health & Safety requirements|
Activity 2: Pre-inspection
|2. Checklist items||Performance Standards|
|2.1 Request for Permit inspection and validating supporting documentation|
|2.2 Bulk Vessel Approval records inspection and validating supporting documentation|
|2.3 Importing country requirements|
|2.4 Supporting documentation|
|2.5 Registered establishment|
|2.7 Boarding vessel and pre-inspection interview|
|2.8 Instructional material|
Activity 3: Inspection of prescribed goods
|3. Checklist items||Performance Standards|
|3.1 Flow path/inspection area|
|3.2 Sampling/presentation of goods|
|3.3 Commodity inspection|
Activity 4: Inspection of bulk vessels
|4. Checklist items||Performance Standards|
|4.1 Inspection of the vessel forecastle/mast house/deck stores/dunnage/weather deck|
|4.2 Inspection of empty vessel holds|
|4.3 Inspection of loaded vessel holds|
|4.4 Inspection of the stores and general gallery areas|
Activity 5: Post-inspection
|5. Checklist items||Performance Standards|
|5.1 Documentation completion|
|5.2 Documentation storage|
|5.3 Consignment rejection procedures|
|5.4 Bulk vessel rejection procedures|
Activity 6: Protocol/importing country requirements
|6. Checklist items||Performance Standards|
|6.1 In-transit cold treatment (ITCT) calibration and loading|
7. Related materials
The following related material is available on the department’s website:
- Plant and Plant Products Authorised Officers webpage
- Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Charging Guidelines
- Plant Export Operations Manual:
- Volume 17: Audit Policy
- Reference: User guide - Plant exports compliance, approval and running records user guide
- Reference: Table of authorised officer job functions
- Reference: Table of horticulture protocol markets