Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search
ABARES

Top navigation abares

  • Department
  • Ministers
  • Media Centre
Main menu

Main navigation ABARES

  • ABARES Home
    ABARES Home
  • About
    About
  • Research topics
    Research topics
  • Products
    Products
  • Data
    Data
  • News
    News
  • Conferences and events
    Conferences and events
  • Careers
    Careers
Department of Agriculture

Breadcrumb

  1. DAFF Home
  2. ABARES
  3. Research topics
  4. Biosecurity
  5. Biosecurity economics
  6. Direct economic impacts of a foot-and-mouth (FMD) disease incursion in Australia, An update of ABARES 2013 estimate

Secondary ABARES

  • Biosecurity economics
    • Cost of established pest animals and weeds to Australian agricultural producers
    • Potential economic consequences of African swine fever in Australia
    • A benefit-cost framework for responding to Varroa
    • Benefits of increased access to minor use chemicals
    • Biosecurity control strategies for red imported fire ants
    • Biosecurity response options for black-striped mussel
    • Consequences of a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak
    • Consequences of a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - 2022 update
    • Economic consequences of a scrapie outbreak in Australia
    • Economic impacts of Xylella fastidiosa on the Australian wine grape and wine-making industries
    • Estimating the value of Australian biosecurity arrangements for equine influenza since the 2007 outbreak
    • Farm gate value of biosecurity
    • Potential impact of the wheat steam rust strain Ug99 in Australia
    • The impacts of Xylella fastidiosa on Australian horticulture and the environment

Direct economic impacts of a foot-and-mouth (FMD) disease incursion in Australia, An update of ABARES 2013 estimate

Updated estimate

A large multi-state foot and mouth disease outbreak has an estimated direct economic impact over 10 years of around $80 billiona(in $2020-21 with a 3% discount rate).

aABARES 2022 estimate based on Buetre et al. (2013) updating for current industry conditions and adopting the discounting approach outlined in Hone et al. (2022).

Background

In 2013, ABARES estimated the direct economic impact of a large multi-state outbreak to be $52 billion over 10 years at a 7% discount rate.

  • The outbreak, as modelled using the AusSpread epidemiological model, is assumed to have already spread from Victoria to all eastern states by the time of detection.
  • The disease is assumed to be eradicated in 5 months from detection at a cost of $0.37 billion.
  • The estimated impacts are largely due to a slow recovery in market access. By year 10 export market access is 80% for beef, 87% for pork and 92% sheep meat.

For the updated estimate to reflect changes in industry structure and economic conditions since 2013 adjustments have been made to reflect changes in the value of industry output. In addition, it is also appropriate for the discount rate used in calculating present values to be changed to 3%, from 7% used in the original study (as described in Hone et al. 2022).

Since 2013 the beef, sheep meat and pork industries have grown (in terms of real gross value product) by 48%, 44% and 33%, respectively while the wool and dairy products industries have shrunk by 23% and 2%. Scaling the 2013 impact estimates to account for industry growth increases the impact to $71 billion (in $2020-21 at a 7 % discount rate) (Table 1). The use of a 3% discount rate increases the estimated impact further to $80 billion (in $2020-21).

Table 1 Updated economic impacts of a large multi-state outbreak ($ billion 2020-21)a
  ABARES (2013)b ABARES update (2022)
7% DRc 7% DRc 3% DRc
Revenue losses      
  Beef 32.26 47.64 53.77
  Sheep meat 10.22 14.73 16.35
  Pork 1.11 1.48 1.60
  Wool 2.19 1.69 1.69
  Dairy products 6.05 5.95 6.50
Sub total 51.84 71.49 79.91
Control cost 0.37 0.40d 0.40d
Total direct cost 52.21 71.90 80.31

Note: a Present value over 10 years; b ABARES 2013 study (Table 5 page 25) (Buetre et al. 2013); c real discount rate; d control costs incurred only in the first year and 2013 estimate adjusted to take account of inflation and 10% reduction in animal numbers over the last decade.

A large multi-state outbreak, which has already spread to all eastern states when detected is a worst-case single outbreak scenario. It is more likely that with proactive surveillance measures the initial infected properties would be detected early resulting in a much smaller outbreak, reduced time to eradicate and regain market access, leading to a significantly smaller direct economic impact. On the other hand, we have estimated the cost of a single outbreak. In some circumstances there could be repeated outbreaks over time, leading to a larger direct economic impact.

With the incursion managed to a smaller outbreak, it is also likely that Australia could establish a specific form of trading zone – a 'disease containment zone' under World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) guidelines – such that uninfected areas may continue to trade in international markets (Article 4.3.7) (8) and avoid some of the impacts associated with an Australia wide export ban.

References

Buetre, B, Wicks, S, Kruger, H, Millist, N, Yainshet, A, Garner, G, Duncan, A, Abdalla, A, Trestrail, C, Hatt, M, Thompson, LJ & Symes, M 2013, Potential socio-economic impacts of an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia, ABARES research report, Canberra, September. CC BY 3.0.

Hone, S, Gooday, P, Hafi, A & Greenville, J 2022, Discount rates and risk in the economic analysis of agricultural projects, ABARES Working Paper 22.02, Canberra, April, DOI: https://doi.org/10.25814/pdwp-6y91. CC BY 4.0.

Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip
Page last updated: 22 July 2022

We acknowledge the continuous connection of First Nations Traditional Owners and Custodians to the lands, seas and waters of Australia. We recognise their care for and cultivation of Country. We pay respect to Elders past and present, and recognise their knowledge and contribution to the productivity, innovation and sustainability of Australia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries.

Artwork: Protecting our Country, Growing our Future
© Amy Allerton, contemporary Aboriginal Artist of the Gumbaynggirr, Bundjalung and Gamilaroi nations.

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Facebook X LinkedIn Instagram