Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search

Help for those affected by flood

Visit nema.gov.au.

Close
ABARES

Top navigation abares

  • Department
  • Ministers
  • Media Centre
Main menu

Main navigation ABARES

  • ABARES Home
    ABARES Home
  • About
    About
  • Research topics
    Research topics
  • Products
    Products
  • Data
    Data
  • News
    News
  • Conferences and events
    Conferences and events
  • Careers
    Careers
Department of Agriculture

Breadcrumb

  1. DAFF Home
  2. ABARES
  3. Research topics
  4. Social sciences
  5. Social aspects of weed management

Secondary ABARES

  • Social sciences
    • Australian marine pest network analysis
    • Biosecurity research
    • Climate research
    • Community engagement
    • Community involvement in plant biosecurity
    • Human dimensions research
    • Making general surveillance work
      • General surveillance case study overviews
      • Guidelines for general surveillance programs
      • Literature review: Understanding general surveillance as a system
      • Research report: Making general surveillance programs work
      • Stocktake of general surveillance initiatives
    • Natural resource management
    • Pest animals and weed management survey
    • Recreational boat operators’ self-management of biofouling in Australia
    • Social aspects of weed management
    • Social impact assessment

Social aspects of weed management

This page presents a sample of findings from two ABARES research projects undertaken to examine various social aspects of weed management.

Systematic review of Australian weed-related social surveys

This report, produced by ABARES for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, presents the results of a review of Australian social survey research related to weeds. The social surveys reviewed in the report typically investigate factors such as stakeholders’ perceptions of weeds; what they do to address weed issues; what encourages or hinders them in taking action; and where they obtain weed-related information. The report analyses and discusses previously published research of this kind, the questions used in surveys, and the views of relevant experts about this research, and what directions future research should take.

[Expand all]

Key findings and report

  • Most previous research was directed at farmers and other rural landholders, and there was a relative neglect of other weeds stakeholders, including urban dwellers, culturally and linguistically diverse groups, and Indigenous people.
  • While the focus of future research may remain on weed management, there is a need to look beyond those people who are seen as being directly responsible for on-ground management of weeds to consider the broader weeds ‘social system’ and its various stakeholders with their differing roles and activities.
  • In light of the move towards a risk return model for biosecurity as recommended by Beale et al. (2008), there is a need to consider the risk pathways along which weeds can spread, and on the people, groups and activities involved in these pathways.
  • Little reference was made to weeds as a biosecurity issue in the literature, or in previous surveys, in spite of the increasing importance of biosecurity in the government policy arena. A biosecurity focus, rather than a traditional ‘weeds and pests’ focus, may help make this kind of research more relevant to a broader policy context, and therefore more policy-relevant and actionable in future.

Download

DocumentPagesFile size
Systematic review of Australian weed-related social surveys PDF 1244.6 MB

Who’s involved with Weeds: Social Network Analysis of funding and information networks for weed management

This report, produced by ABARES for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, examines the funding and information relationships existing between different stakeholders involved in weed management in Australia. This research employed a social network analysis approach to investigate where community groups and institutions (such as local and state government agencies) obtain weed management information and funding.

[Expand all]

Key findings and report

  • The study found that involvement and interest in managing weeds is extensive and complex. There is large public interest in weed management with information and funding obtained from multiple places, largely dominated by local and state government departments and regional Natural Resource Management (NRM) bodies.
  • While a significant amount of funding for weed management was delivered through regional base level funding to NRM bodies, a large amount of additional information and funding was delivered through local and state/territory governments. Regional NRM bodies were not the major provider of information to other institutional respondents (primarily local government).

The findings of both studies could be used by researchers and research funding bodies in setting future research priorities, and designing and conducting further social research about weeds and weed management in Australia. Relevant government policy makers and program managers could use the findings to inform future policies and programs dealing with weed-related issues.

Download

DocumentPagesFile size
Who’s involved with Weeds: Social Network Analysis of funding and information networks for weed management PDF 1203.6 MB
​
Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI
Last updated: 04 November 2019

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of country throughout Australia and recognise their continuing connection to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.