Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search

Help for those affected by flood

Visit recovery.gov.au.

Close
ABARES

Top navigation abares

  • Department
  • Ministers
  • Media Centre
Main menu

Main navigation ABARES

  • ABARES Home
    ABARES Home
  • About
    About
  • Research topics
    Research topics
  • Products
    Products
  • Data
    Data
  • News
    News
  • Conferences and events
    Conferences and events
  • Careers
    Careers
Department of Climate Change, Energy, Enviroment and Water

Breadcrumb

  1. DAFF Home
  2. ABARES
  3. Research topics
  4. Farm surveys and analysis
  5. Financial performance of cropping farms

Secondary ABARES

  • Farm surveys and analysis
    • Farm performance
    • Farm survey data
    • Disaggregating farm performance statistics by size
    • Previous research

Financial performance of cropping farms

2019–20 to 2021–22

  • An estimated 18% of Australian farm businesses are classified as cropping farms (16,000 farms), of which 7,500 are specialist cropping farms and around 8,900 are mixed livestock-cropping farms (see Methodology).
  • Very good seasonal conditions and high commodity prices in 2021–22 were the major drivers of strong farm financial performance for cropping farms across Australia, with timely rainfall in 2021 leading to a near record winter crop in most regions.
  • At the national level, farm cash income for cropping farms is estimated to have increased by around 28% to average $619,000 per farm in 2021–22. The increase in income is mainly due to higher receipts from wheat, barley and oilseeds. Increased expenditure on fuel and fertiliser is estimated to have partially offset record gains in crop receipts, but the full effect of higher input costs is likely to be felt in 2022–23 (Figure 1). The timing of purchases of inputs and sales of crops during the year is likely to have influenced the results observed on individual farms given the fluctuations occurring in the market.
  • The average farm cash income for cropping farms in 2021–22 is estimated to have been around 76% above the long-term average of $352,000 per farm in real terms for the 10 years to 2020–21.
  • The percentage of cropping farms with negative net income in 2021–22 is estimated to have been around 10% (Figure 2).
  • In 2021–22, the average rate of return for cropping farms (excluding capital appreciation) is estimated to have been 4.3%, above the 10-year average of 3.3%. 
  • Farm cash incomes for cropping farms are expected to have increased in 2021–22 in Western Australia (125%) and South Australia (5%), but to have declined in Tasmania (–60%), New South Wales (–13%), Victoria (–3%) and Queensland (–2%).

The PowerBI dashboard may not meet accessibility requirements. For information about the contents of these dashboards contact ABARES.

Figure 1 Farm cash income, cropping farms, Australia, 2010–11 to 2021–22
average per farm

A line graph showing a general upwards trend in incomes, particularly in the last two years following a few years of decline. Incomes are shown to increase from $272,000 in 2010–11 to $619,000 in 2021–22.
Note: Provisional estimates for 2021–22. Data for all years expressed in 2021–22 dollars.
Source: ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey

Figure 2 Distribution of farm cash income by quartile, cropping farms, Australia, 2017–18 to 2021–22

5 stacked columns for the 5 years from 2017–18 to 2021–22 showing farm cash income split into quartiles of farms. The distribution was most skewed towards positive income in 2021–22 and was also the widest over the period.
Note: Top and bottom 2% of farms are excluded. Provisional estimates for 2021–22. Data expressed in 2021–22 dollars.
Source: ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey

Specialist cropping farms

  • The average farm cash income for specialist cropping farms at the national level is estimated to have been around $897,000 per farm in 2021–22, around 89% above the average in real terms for the previous 10 years (Map 1).
  • Although remaining strong, incomes in 2021–22 for specialist cropping farms in Queensland, southern New South Wales and parts of South Australia were below the long term average.
  • The average rate of return (excluding capital appreciation) for specialist cropping farms at 5.7% in 2021–22 is estimated to have been well above the 10-year average of 4.2% per farm.

Map 1 Farm cash income, specialist cropping farms, Australia, 2021–22

Map 1: A map showing that most of south-west Australia experienced farm cash incomes greater than 25% above the previous 10 year average in 2021–22. East and south-east Australia experienced a mix of farm cash incomes greater than 25% below and above the previous 10 year average.
Note: Provisional estimates for 2021–22.
Source: ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey

Mixed livestock-cropping farms

  • The average farm cash income for mixed livestock-cropping farms is estimated to have been around $396,000 per farm in 2021–22, around 63% above the average in real terms for the previous 10 years.
  • The average rate of return (excluding capital appreciation) for mixed livestock-cropping farms at 3.0% in 2021–22 is estimated to have been above the 10-year average of 2.2%.

  • Debt is an important source of funds for farm investment and ongoing working capital for many cropping farms. At the national scale, average cropping farm debt increased by 7% from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021, with most of the increase going towards land purchases (Figure 3).
  • Despite increased debt, farm equity ratios increased slightly to average 87% in 2020–21 (Figure 4). Improvements in farmers’ equity position was mainly due to a rise in average land values in 2020–21.

Figure 3 Farm debt by purpose, cropping farms, Australia, 2008–09 to 2020–21
average per farm

A column chart showing farm debt broken down into debt for the purposes of land purchases, working capital, and other debt.  Total debt increased from 2008 to 2021, with increases across all categories.
Note: Annual farm debt expressed as an average of farm debt at 1 July and 30 June. Data expressed in 2021–22 dollars.
Source: ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey

Debt servicing

  • Among a range of factors, the viability of a farm is affected by its capacity to service debt. The servicing of debt consists of making interest payments and paying down the principal. The proportion of net farm income spent on interest payments (interest coverage ratio) is a useful indicator of short-term capacity to service debt. The average interest coverage ratio for cropping farms has improved over the last decade due to continued low interest rates and rising farm incomes.
  • Cropping farms with both low equity (equity ratio less than 70%) and that pay a high proportion of income on interest payments (interest coverage ratio higher than 40%) are likely to be particularly sensitive to increases in interest rates. In 2020–21, the percentage of cropping farms in this category was estimated to have been around 2%, down from an average of 6% over the previous 10 years.

Figure 4 Farm equity and interest coverage, cropping farms, Australia, 2008–09 to 2020–21
average per farm

A line graph showing average farm business equity ratios trending up from 83% in 2008–09 to 87% in 2020–21, and interest coverage ratios trending down from an average of 22% in 2008–09 to 11% in 2020–21.
Note: Equity ratio is calculated as farm business equity (capital minus debt) as a percentage of owned capital at 30 June. Interest coverage ratio is calculated as total interest paid as a proportion of net farm income less finance costs.
Source: ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey

Liquid assets and non-farm income

  • Many cropping farms have substantial holdings of liquid assets relative to farm household income that makes them well placed to withstand short-term downturns in income, although there is wide distribution across farm sizes (Figure 5).
  • Non-farm income increases business resilience to shocks to farm financial performance for many farms. In particular, small cropping farms sourced the majority of their household incomes (net farm income plus non-farm income) from non-farm sources in 2020–21. The proportion of income sourced off farm was substantially lower for larger farms.
  • Farm Management Deposits (FMDs) are an important financial risk management tool for many cropping farms and forms part of their liquid assets. At 30 June 2021, an estimated 38% of cropping farms held FMD accounts, at an average value of $342,000 per farm. The average value of FMDs in 2021 was lower than the peak the previous year as some farmers made draw-downs after drought in 2019–20.

Figure 5 Farm household income and liquid assets by farm size, livestock farms, 2020–21
average per farm

A column chart showing the value of farm cash income, non-farm income, and liquid assets for small, medium, large, and very-large farms (measured by turnover). The value of liquid assets increased with each increase in farm size, but grew smaller relative to overall income.
Note: Size groups determined by farm business turnover. Small (less than $250,000), Medium ($250,000 to $750,000), Large ($750,000 to $2million), Very-large (more than $2million).
Source: ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey

The data in this report is drawn from ABARES Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey (AAGIS). AAGIS covers broadacre farms with an estimated value of agricultural operations (EVAO) greater than $40,000. Broadacre farms account for around 60% of all Australian farm businesses and they include the following industries (defined by Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC)):

Cropping farms

  • Wheat and Other Crops Farming: Specialised producers of cereal grains, coarse grains, pulses, and oilseeds.
  • Mixed Livestock-Crops Farming: Farm businesses engaged in producing sheep and/or beef cattle in conjunction with substantial activity in broadacre crops such as wheat, coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds.

Livestock farms

  • Beef Cattle Farming: Specialised producers of beef cattle.
  • Sheep Farming: Specialised producers of prime lambs, sheep, or wool.
  • Sheep-Beef Cattle Farming: Producers who have a mix of sheep and beef cattle. Farms classified to sheep-beef industry combine sheep and beef enterprises such that neither enterprise dominates the other.

AAGIS provides a wide range of information on the current and historical economic performance of farm business units, including farm costs, receipts, income and profit, debt, assets, farm capital and labour, industry and farm size.

To reduce respondent burden and complexity of the survey ABARES developed a model-based approach to producing its projections of key estimates. Data in this report for 2021–22 is derived from this model.

Further information on ABARES farm surveys and survey methodology can be found on the ABARES website.

Previous reports

Previous versions of this and related reports.

Farm surveys definitions and methods

Further information about our survey definitions and methods.

Farm data portal

The Farm Data Portal is an interactive tool containing all data from ABARES surveys of broadacre and dairy farms, and outputs from those surveys, all in the one location.

Financial performance of cropping farms 2019–20 to 2021–22 (PDF)

Financial performance of cropping farms 2019–20 to 2021–22 (XSLX)

How to cite this research

ABARES Statement of Professional Independence

Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI
Last updated: 24 June 2022

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of country throughout Australia and recognise their continuing connection to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.