Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search
Home

Top navigation main

  • News & media
  • Jobs
  • Ministers
  • Contact us
Main menu

AWE Main

  • Agriculture and land
    Agriculture and land Building stronger and more sustainable agriculture, fisheries, forestry and land care.
    • Animal health
    • Climate change and agriculture
    • Drought, disaster and rural support
    • Farming, food and drought
    • Fisheries
    • Forestry
    • Levies and charges on agricultural products
    • Mouse infestation advice
    • Plant health
    Xylella

    Protect against unwanted plant pests

    Our biosecurity system helps protects us. Everyone has a role in supporting our biosecurity system.

    Find out more

  • Biosecurity and trade
    Biosecurity and trade
    • Aircraft, vessels and military
    • Biosecurity policy
    • Cats and dogs
    • Exporting
    • Importing
    • Pests, diseases and weeds
    • Public awareness and education
    • Trade and market access
    • Travelling or sending goods to Australia
    • Report a concern
    Brown marmorated stink bug

    BMSB Seasonal Measures

    Australia has strengthened seasonal measures to manage the risk of BMSB.

    View our seasonal measures

  • Science and research
    Science and research Undertaking research and collecting data to support informed decisions and policies.
    • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES)
    • Plant Innovation Centre
    Abares

    ABARES Insights

    Get 'snapshots’ of agricultural, forestry and fisheries industries, or analysis of key issues.

    Find out more

  • About us
    About us We enhance our agricultural industries and trade, and manage the threat of biosecurity risks to Australia.
    • Accountability and reporting
    • Assistance, grants and tenders
    • Contact us
    • Fees and charges
    • News and media
    • Our commitment to you
    • Payments
    • People and jobs
    • Publications
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Budget 2025-26

    Budget 2025-26

    The 2025–26 Portfolio Budget Statements were released on 25 March 2025.

    Find out more

  • Online services
    Online services We do business with you using online platforms. This makes it easier for you to meet your legal requirements.
Department of Agriculture

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Biosecurity and trade
  3. Biosecurity
  4. Import risk analyses
  5. Animal import risk analyses
  6. Gamma Irradiation
  7. Questions and answers

Sidebar first - Biosecurity

  • Animal import risk analyses
    • Review of prawns and prawn products
      • Background: prawn and prawn products review
      • Prawn imports and biosecurity
      • Submissions received on the Review of prawns and prawn products – draft report
      • Submissions received on Australia’s current prawn import policy
    • Cooked turkey meat from the United States
      • Cooked turkey meat from the United States - Commencement of a review
    • Cooked duck meat from Thailand
    • Dairy products for human consumption
    • Fish and fish products for use as pet food and stockfeed
    • Hatching eggs of poultry
    • Import of live sturgeon for aquaculture
    • Natural sausage casings
    • Psittacine birds
    • Egg powder from approved countries
    • Zoo bovids from approved countries

Questions and answers

Why is gamma irradiation used?

The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry applies a range of biosecurity treatments to products of animal origin. The treatments available include heat treatment and gamma irradiation.

Gamma irradiation is a risk management measure that may be offered for certain products of animal origin that do not fully meet Australia’s import requirements, or where the importer is unable to provide the department with sufficient information to complete a risk assessment.

What is the objective of this review?

The main objective of the review is to identify and recommend appropriate doses of irradiation needed to inactivate bacterial, fungal and viral pathogens, and parasites of animal biosecurity concern.

This review will enable the department to take a more flexible approach to the irradiation dose used, and may allow the use of lower levels of irradiation that still protect Australia’s favourable animal health status in cases where the specific pathogens of concern are identified.

How was this review conducted?

The review analysed scientific literature, current scientific evidence, standards and recommendations of international bodies such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), and other balanced sources of information and opinion about the radiosensitivity of pathogens.

What are the findings of the review?

The review found that while 50 kGy should remain the current standard, it may be possible to use lower levels of irradiation and still protect Australia’s favourable animal health status in cases where the pathogens of concern are known. However, there may be instances where the department may recommend a higher dose for some high risk products (e.g. infected tissue for research purposes). Gamma irradiation was not found to be a practical treatment to address biosecurity issues with transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) agents such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy and scrapie.

​What are the effects of irradiation?

Effect on microorganisms

Gamma irradiation causes damage to the microorganism. The potential for lethal damage is influenced by a range of environmental conditions such as oxygen, temperature, and water content.

Effect on product and product safety

It is now well established that irradiation does affect certain vitamins and other nutrients and does produce peroxides and other radiolytic by-products, some of which may be toxic and/or carcinogenic, and that these effects are dose related.

However, the same is true for thermal processing and possibly other food production technologies.

All food, imported or domestically produced, intended for human consumption, must comply with the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code). Irradiation is not an option as a biosecurity measure for food imported for human consumption unless supported by the Code.

Can irradiation be used as a biosecurity treatment for pet food?

Irradiation of pet food for cats presents a unique case and because of detrimental nutritional changes in cat food, irradiation has not been used for this commodity since 2009. To address the risk associated with cats being fed irradiated dog food, the department requires, as a condition on the import permit, that imported irradiated dog food be appropriately labelled as not fit for consumption by cats.

The available scientific evidence supports the use of irradiation as a biosecurity treatment for pet food only in exceptional circumstances. It is not supported for those products likely to be consumed as a significant proportion of an animal’s diet (e.g. kibble).

How is the inactivation of organisms measured?

The D10 value, sometimes referred to as the D value, is a measure of the treatment required to inactivate 90 per cent (i.e. a one log reduction) of the organisms present or to reduce the microbial population to one-tenth its number. For irradiation, the value is measured as the irradiation dose required to achieve a one log reduction in the titre (i.e. population) of the organism.

What does sterility assurance level mean?

Sterility assurance level (SAL) is a term used in microbiology to describe the acceptable probability of a single organism being viable after it has been subjected to the sterilisation process. Because absolute sterility cannot be ensured, SAL is used as a predetermined limit to the number of viable organisms that would be tolerated in the product following treatment.

SAL is also used to describe the killing efficacy of a sterilisation process: a very effective sterilisation process has a very high SAL. The department has set the SAL at 10-6 for each pathogen of biosecurity concern unless an alternative SAL is established, through a risk analysis, for the specific pathogen or product.

How is the bio-burden in product estimated?

The department generally assumes that tissues used in the manufacture of biological material such as vaccines would be derived from healthy sources. In most cases, the department assumes the bio-burden to be close to zero.

Was the public consulted about the review?

Yes, the draft review was released on 30 January 2013 for a 60-day public consultation period. Three submissions were received.

The department considered these stakeholder submissions when finalising the review.

General enquiries

Call 1800 900 090

Contact us online

Report a biosecurity concern

Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip
Page last updated: 01 May 2024

We acknowledge the continuous connection of First Nations Traditional Owners and Custodians to the lands, seas and waters of Australia. We recognise their care for and cultivation of Country. We pay respect to Elders past and present, and recognise their knowledge and contribution to the productivity, innovation and sustainability of Australia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries.

Artwork: Protecting our Country, Growing our Future
© Amy Allerton, contemporary Aboriginal Artist of the Gumbaynggirr, Bundjalung and Gamilaroi nations.

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Facebook X LinkedIn Instagram