Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search
Home

Top navigation main

  • News & media
  • Jobs
  • Ministers
  • Contact us
Main menu

AWE Main

  • Agriculture and land
    Agriculture and land Building stronger and more sustainable agriculture, fisheries, forestry and land care.
    • Animal health
    • Climate change and agriculture
    • Drought, disaster and rural support
    • Farming, food and drought
    • Fisheries
    • Forestry
    • Levies and charges on agricultural products
    • Mouse infestation advice
    • Plant health
    Xylella

    Protect against unwanted plant pests

    Our biosecurity system helps protects us. Everyone has a role in supporting our biosecurity system.

    Find out more

  • Biosecurity and trade
    Biosecurity and trade
    • Aircraft, vessels and military
    • Biosecurity policy
    • Cats and dogs
    • Exporting
    • Importing
    • Pests, diseases and weeds
    • Public awareness and education
    • Trade and market access
    • Travelling or sending goods to Australia
    • Report a concern
    Brown marmorated stink bug

    BMSB Seasonal Measures

    Australia has strengthened seasonal measures to manage the risk of BMSB.

    View our seasonal measures

  • Science and research
    Science and research Undertaking research and collecting data to support informed decisions and policies.
    • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES)
    • Plant Innovation Centre
    Abares

    ABARES Insights

    Get 'snapshots’ of agricultural, forestry and fisheries industries, or analysis of key issues.

    Find out more

  • About us
    About us We enhance our agricultural industries and trade, and manage the threat of biosecurity risks to Australia.
    • Accountability and reporting
    • Assistance, grants and tenders
    • Contact us
    • Fees and charges
    • News and media
    • Our commitment to you
    • Payments
    • People and jobs
    • Publications
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Budget 2025-26

    Budget 2025-26

    The 2025–26 Portfolio Budget Statements were released on 25 March 2025.

    Find out more

  • Online services
    Online services We do business with you using online platforms. This makes it easier for you to meet your legal requirements.
Department of Agriculture

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Biosecurity and trade
  3. Biosecurity
  4. Import risk analyses
  5. Biosecurity Advices
  6. ba2015-22

Sidebar first - Biosecurity

  • Import risk analyses
    • Import request
    • Conducting an import risk analysis
      • Appropriate Level of Protection
      • Australia’s international biosecurity obligations
      • Roles and responsibilities in an import risk analysis
      • Scientific Advisory Group
    • Animal import risk analyses
      • Review of prawns and prawn products
        • Background: prawn and prawn products review
        • Prawn imports and biosecurity
        • Submissions received on the Review of prawns and prawn products – draft report
        • Submissions received on Australia’s current prawn import policy
      • Cooked turkey meat from the United States
        • Cooked turkey meat from the United States - Commencement of a review
      • Cooked duck meat from Thailand
      • Dairy products for human consumption
      • Fish and fish products for use as pet food and stockfeed
      • Hatching eggs of poultry
      • Import of live sturgeon for aquaculture
      • Natural sausage casings
      • Psittacine birds
      • Egg powder from approved countries
      • Zoo bovids from approved countries
    • Plant risk analyses
      • Plant commodity/country and pest risk analyses
      • How we conduct a plant risk analysis
    • Group pest risk analyses
      • Group pest risk analysis for scale insects
        • Draft report fact sheet
      • Group pest risk analysis for thrips and orthotospoviruses
        • Draft report
        • Fact sheet
        • Final report
      • Group pest risk analysis for mealybugs
        • Draft report
        • Draft report fact sheet
        • Final report
        • Final report fact sheet
    • Biological control agents
      • Risk analyses
        • Completed Risk Analyses
        • Current Risk Analyses
      • Host test lists
      • Protocol for biological control agents
    • Weed assessments
      • Development of the Weed Risk Assessment system
      • Weed risk assessments frequently asked questions
      • Reasons for the Weed Risk Assessment system
      • The Weed Risk Assessment process
        • Weed Risk Assessment system
    • Biosecurity Import Risk Analysis guidelines
    • Centre of excellence for biosecurity risk analysis
    • Biosecurity advices
    • Register as a stakeholder

Biosecurity Advice 2015/22 - Final report for the review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji

11 December 2015

This Biosecurity Advice notifies stakeholders of the release of the final report for the review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji.


The commencement of a review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji was announced in Biosecurity Advice 2014/14 on 17 November 2014. A draft report was issued for stakeholder comment on 22 June 2015 for a 30 day consultation period.

The review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji

The review was undertaken to meet a commitment in the final import risk analysis for fresh ginger from Fiji, which was released in January 2013. Its terms of reference include evaluating the efficacy of measures applied to manage the biosecurity risks associated with fresh ginger from Fiji, and making recommendations on actions needed to confirm the quarantine status of the burrowing nematode, Radopholus similis, and the efficacy of any phytosanitary measures for managing it and pests of quarantine concern. The review was supported by an extensive literature review and analysis of the science relevant to the quarantine status of Radopholus similis.

Inspection outcomes of the five consignments of ginger imported in the first year of trade, including laboratory analysis of samples from these imports, were also assessed and presented in the report.

Outcomes of ginger imports in the first season

A total of five consignments of fresh ginger were exported from Fiji to Australia in late 2014 and early 2015. These were the first imports under the permits issued, which applied the measures set by the Import Risk Analysis for fresh ginger from Fiji. All consignments were accompanied by the appropriate phytosanitary certification by Fiji biosecurity authorities and were inspected by the department when they arrived in Australia. No live quarantine pests were detected during the department’s inspections, and all five consignments were released from quarantine. Some non-quarantine pests were detected with no remedial action required, and a number of dead insects were also noted.

Yam scale (Aspidiella hartii) was detected on four consignments of imported ginger during the first season of trade and prompted a review of phytosanitary measures for this quarantine pest. The current requirement is for imported ginger to be free of yam scale based on a standard 600 unit inspection. The finding of yam scale during import inspections indicated that this requirement has not been met. On-arrival inspections and independent testing confirmed that all yam scales detected were dead. This is an expected consequence of fumigation with methyl bromide and the department therefore recommends a mandatory methyl bromide fumigation treatment be introduced for yam scale.

Quarantine status of Radopholus similis

The department undertook a comprehensive review of Radopholus similis covering:

  • the scientific literature
  • the historic and current situation of Radopholus similis on ginger in both Fiji and Australia, and
  • interceptions on imports of Fiji ginger into Australia over the first (2014–15) season

In undertaking the review the department consulted with technical experts nominated by the Australian ginger industry, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (QDAF) and Fijian authorities. The department also visited ginger production areas in Queensland and Fiji, held discussions with technical experts during these visits and actively sought additional relevant information.

The scientific literature

The department and technical experts representing the Australian ginger industry, QDAF and Fiji agreed that the Radopholus similis pathogenicity experiments conducted in Fiji during 2009 and Australia during 2012 were not directly comparable and did not provide scientific proof of a significant difference between Fijian and Australian Radopholus similis isolates on ginger.

The review found no clear supporting scientific evidence in the wider biological literature for the existence of a strain of Radopholus similis in Fiji with significantly different pathogenicity on ginger compared to Radopholus similis already present in Australia. There was no consistent scientific evidence in the literature for biological factors influencing differences in pathogenicity and host preference in Radopholus similis.

The historic and current situation of Radopholus similis on ginger in both Fiji and Australia

In 2007, a survey of 22 farms across nine Fijian ginger growing regions recorded significant damage caused by Radopholus similis on some farms in the Veikoba district. Radopholus similis was also recorded in low numbers at Muanaweni.

However, there is currently no evidence that Radopholus similis is causing damage in ginger fields in Fiji. Surveys of soil and ginger conducted by the Fijian Ministry of Agriculture’s Research Division across a range of ginger farms in seven localities between June and September 2014, including fields that were infested with Radopholus similis in 2007, detected no Radopholus similis (although other nematode species were detected). Further sampling of volunteer ginger (regrowth from previous crop) and crowsfoot (a weedy host of Radopholus similis) in February 2015 also did not detect any Radopholus similis. There have been no reports of Radopholus similis being found since the publication of the draft review report in June 2015.

Fiji has indicated that ginger production practices have been modified to prevent and manage infestation with Radopholus similis. Ginger production in Fiji currently involves crop rotation with plants that are not hosts for Radopholus similis with some growers also including an additional six month fallow period. Growers are encouraged to plant in new areas not previously used for ginger production. Growers receive extensive training on seed treatment and preparation and equipment is provided on a loan scheme for hot water treatment of seed.

Conclusion

There is presently insufficient scientific evidence to support the claim that Fiji has a strain of Radopholus similis with significantly different pathogenicity on ginger compared to the Radopholus similis already present in Australia. However, the department will retain the current provisional quarantine pest status for Radopholus similis for an additional reasonable period of time, subject to a number of conditions. During this time period, the existing measures for Radopholus similis, recommended in the final IRA report, will remain in place, with the addition of methyl bromide fumigation for yam scale.

The department and technical experts representing the Australian ginger industry, QDAF and Fiji agree that the only way to scientifically prove such a difference would be to do an experiment comparing Fijian and Australian Radopholus similis isolates side-by-side in an appropriately controlled trial using a methodology agreed by all parties. Since the release of the draft report, QDAF has confirmed its intention to undertake such an experiment in Australia to determine if there are any differences in the economic impact on ginger yield and quality caused by Radopholus similis isolates from Fiji and Australia. Conduct of the experiment will be subject to the following conditions:

  • the availability of relevant Radopholus similis isolates
  • an agreed protocol for importation and appropriate quarantine containment
  • agreement by AGIA, QDAF, Fiji and the department, on the experimental design and methodology
  • reasonable timeframes.

Fijian authorities have advised that no Radopholus similis cultures are being held in Fiji. The department has formally requested assistance from Fiji to obtain Radopholus similis specimens from ginger production areas. Fiji has agreed to assist and activities are currently underway to source the required specimens. It is understood that it may be difficult to source new specimens from the field considering its current reported low prevalence.

The department is prepared to review import conditions if additional relevant information becomes available.

The final report and information about the risk analysis process are available at Finalised plant policy and scientific reviews.

 

Kim Ritman, PhD
Australian Chief Plant Protection Officer

Contact: Kim Ritman
Telephone: +61 2 6272 4671
Facsimile: +61 2 6272 3307

​

General enquiries

Call 1800 900 090

Contact us online

Report a biosecurity concern

Other format

  • Biosecurity Advice 2015/22 - Final report for the review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji
     PDF [454 KB]

Key documents

  • Final report - Review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji PDF Icon PDF [8.9 MB]
  • Final report - Review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji PDF Icon Word [5.5 MB]

Related pages

  • Questions and Answers
  • Draft report - Review of import conditions for fresh ginger from Fiji
Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip
Page last updated: 04 November 2019

We acknowledge the continuous connection of First Nations Traditional Owners and Custodians to the lands, seas and waters of Australia. We recognise their care for and cultivation of Country. We pay respect to Elders past and present, and recognise their knowledge and contribution to the productivity, innovation and sustainability of Australia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries.

Artwork: Protecting our Country, Growing our Future
© Amy Allerton, contemporary Aboriginal Artist of the Gumbaynggirr, Bundjalung and Gamilaroi nations.

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Facebook X LinkedIn Instagram