Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search
Home

Top navigation main

  • News & media
  • Jobs
  • Ministers
  • Contact us
Main menu

AWE Main

  • Agriculture and land
    Agriculture and land Building stronger and more sustainable agriculture, fisheries, forestry and land care.
    • Animal health
    • Climate change and agriculture
    • Drought, disaster and rural support
    • Farming, food and drought
    • Fisheries
    • Forestry
    • Levies and charges on agricultural products
    • Mouse infestation advice
    • Plant health
    Xylella

    Protect against unwanted plant pests

    Our biosecurity system helps protects us. Everyone has a role in supporting our biosecurity system.

    Find out more

  • Biosecurity and trade
    Biosecurity and trade
    • Aircraft, vessels and military
    • Biosecurity policy
    • Cats and dogs
    • Exporting
    • Importing
    • Pests, diseases and weeds
    • Public awareness and education
    • Trade and market access
    • Travelling or sending goods to Australia
    • Report a concern
    Brown marmorated stink bug

    BMSB Seasonal Measures

    Australia has strengthened seasonal measures to manage the risk of BMSB.

    View our seasonal measures

  • Science and research
    Science and research Undertaking research and collecting data to support informed decisions and policies.
    • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES)
    • Plant Innovation Centre
    Abares

    ABARES Insights

    Get 'snapshots’ of agricultural, forestry and fisheries industries, or analysis of key issues.

    Find out more

  • About us
    About us We enhance our agricultural industries and trade, and manage the threat of biosecurity risks to Australia.
    • Accountability and reporting
    • Assistance, grants and tenders
    • Contact us
    • Fees and charges
    • News and media
    • Our commitment to you
    • Payments
    • People and jobs
    • Publications
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Budget 2025-26

    Budget 2025-26

    The 2025–26 Portfolio Budget Statements were released on 25 March 2025.

    Find out more

  • Online services
    Online services We do business with you using online platforms. This makes it easier for you to meet your legal requirements.
Department of Agriculture

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Biosecurity and trade
  3. Biosecurity
  4. Import risk analyses
  5. Biosecurity Advices
  6. ba2016-26
  7. qa

Sidebar first - Biosecurity

  • Import risk analyses
    • Import request
    • Conducting an import risk analysis
      • Appropriate Level of Protection
      • Australia’s international biosecurity obligations
      • Roles and responsibilities in an import risk analysis
      • Scientific Advisory Group
    • Animal import risk analyses
      • Review of prawns and prawn products
        • Background: prawn and prawn products review
        • Prawn imports and biosecurity
        • Submissions received on the Review of prawns and prawn products – draft report
        • Submissions received on Australia’s current prawn import policy
      • Cooked turkey meat from the United States
        • Cooked turkey meat from the United States - Commencement of a review
      • Cooked duck meat from Thailand
      • Dairy products for human consumption
      • Fish and fish products for use as pet food and stockfeed
      • Hatching eggs of poultry
      • Import of live sturgeon for aquaculture
      • Natural sausage casings
      • Psittacine birds
      • Egg powder from approved countries
      • Zoo bovids from approved countries
    • Plant risk analyses
      • Plant commodity/country and pest risk analyses
      • How we conduct a plant risk analysis
    • Group pest risk analyses
      • Group pest risk analysis for scale insects
        • Draft report fact sheet
      • Group pest risk analysis for thrips and orthotospoviruses
        • Draft report
        • Fact sheet
        • Final report
      • Group pest risk analysis for mealybugs
        • Draft report
        • Draft report fact sheet
        • Final report
        • Final report fact sheet
    • Biological control agents
      • Risk analyses
        • Completed Risk Analyses
        • Current Risk Analyses
      • Host test lists
      • Protocol for biological control agents
    • Weed assessments
      • Development of the Weed Risk Assessment system
      • Weed risk assessments frequently asked questions
      • Reasons for the Weed Risk Assessment system
      • The Weed Risk Assessment process
        • Weed Risk Assessment system
    • Biosecurity Import Risk Analysis guidelines
    • Centre of excellence for biosecurity risk analysis
    • Biosecurity advices
    • Register as a stakeholder

Questions and Answers

​​​​Final review of existing policy

[expand all]

Why was the review of policy undertaken?

The Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources initiated this review in response to requests from the Australian nursery industry and the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) New Zealand, to improve import conditions for Calla lily (Zantedeschia species) dormant tubers.

What is the scope of the final review?

The scope of this review is limited to:

  • reviewing the existing policy for the importation of Zantedeschia dormant tubers into Australia;
  • reviewing the pest list for Zantedeschia species to identify any new pests; and
  • evaluating the appropriateness of existing risk management measures for identified risks and recommend additional measures where required.

What commodities does this review cover?

This review covers the import of dormant tubers of Zantedeschia species from all countries. Zantedeschia species, commonly known as Calla lilies, are used as cut flowers and garden ornamentals. Calla lilies can reproduce from tubers, which are thickened underground organs. Tubers for export should be dormant, which means that they have no new growth.

What changes to the import conditions have been recommended for Zantedeschia dormant tubers?

Several changes have been recommended that will provide greater flexibility to importers, while managing the biosecurity risks and ensuring that Australia is protected from unwanted pests and diseases.

  • updating the biosecurity pest list for Zantedeschia dormant tubers to include new pests that were previously not specifically regulated under the existing import policy.
  • permitting alternative treatments to mandatory methyl bromide fumigation for Zantedeschia dormant tubers, including hot water treatment or insecticidal dip.
  • reducing the amount of time that dormant tubers from non-approved sources must be grown in a post-entry quarantine (PEQ) facility or an Approved Arrangement site, from a minimum of 12 weeks to a minimum of six weeks.
  • permitting tubers produced under a systems approach, subject to verification. The systems approach is based on a combination of production practices, crop monitoring and verification of pathogen freedom through certification. Zantedeschia dormant tubers meeting the systems approach requirements are recommended to be permitted entry into Australia without requiring growth in PEQ.

By providing greater flexibility in the conditions, has the biosecurity risk increased?

No, the recommendation to allow tubers to be introduced under a greater range of conditions is based on a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature and adequately addresses quarantine risks.

Tubers of unknown health will be required to be grown in PEQ, which will allow quarantine pests to be detected during the active growth of the plant. Mandatory on-arrival inspection and treatment will address any risks associated with live insects, soil and other extraneous contaminants of quarantine concern.

The risk of tubers produced under a systems approach is comprehensively addressed off-shore through stringent conditions throughout the production, packaging and export processes. These conditions are then verified on-arrival in Australia.

Has the risk increased with reducing the PEQ period of tubers from non-approved sources?

No, the recommendation to reduce the PEQ period is based on a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature, which revealed that this requirement adequately address the risk of importing Zantedeschia tubers from non-approved sources. Zantedeschia plants produce sufficient growth to determine freedom from identified biosecurity risks within 6–10 weeks.

Has the risk increased with allowing the import of dormant tubers produced under a systems approach without being grown in PEQ?

No, there are a number of requirements under the recommended systems approach that address the risks associated with imported dormant tubers. The requirements include:

  • sourcing dormant tubers from high health mother plants that are free from identified biosecurity risks;
  • crop monitoring and management;
  • mandatory treatment;
  • pre-export inspection; and
  • on-arrival inspection.

These requirements adequately address the risk of quarantine pests associated with Zantedeschia dormant tubers.

Does the report consider regional differences?

The Australian Government recognises that certain areas of Australia have a different pest and disease status from other areas.

Differences in pest and disease status, geography, climate, host and vector distribution across geographic regions are always considered as part of biosecurity risk assessments. These variations continue to be recognised through the Biosecurity Import Risk Analysis process under the Biosecurity Act 2015.The department takes account of regional differences in policy reviews, including in this report.

Recognition of regional differences must be based on supporting scientific evidence and meet international standards for regional pests. The Australian government and state and territory governments work together to ensure regional differences, supported by scientific evidence, are reflected in Australia’s import conditions.

Will Australia be adequately protected from exotic pests and diseases?

Yes, Australia will be adequately protected from exotic pests and diseases. This review has identified the risks associated with Zantedeschia dormant tubers and has recommended measures to protect Australia’s ornamental, forestry and horticultural industries and the environment. The assessment is based on the latest scientific information and reflects Australia’s stringent approach to managing biosecurity risks.

Can Australia have zero risk?

Science-based risk analysis provides an important foundation for safe trade. Australia accepts imports only when we are confident that the risks of pests and diseases that could be associated with specific imports can be managed in accordance with Australia’s appropriate level of protection. This requires quarantine risks to be reduced to at least a very low level.

Australia exports about two-thirds of its agricultural produce. The future of our agricultural and food industries, including their capacity to contribute to growth and jobs, depends on Australia’s capacity to maintain a good plant and animal health status. Our future also depends on the conditions our industries face overseas.

It is important to Australia that fair and consistent trading rules are in place around the world, as provided by the World Trade Organization. We cannot expect trading partners to take our produce if we are not prepared to apply the same rules to their products. Nor could we be optimistic about new markets opening up.

A ‘zero risk’ stance is impractical as it would mean no tourists, no international travel and no imports of any commodities. Nevertheless, Australia invests heavily in biosecurity to ensure that risks are managed to at least a very low level.

Stakeholder consultation

[expand all]

How did the department consult stakeholders?

The department consults stakeholders through the public release of a draft report for comments.

The department released the Draft review of policy: importation of Zantedeschia dormant tubers into Australia for a 30 day stakeholder consultation period on 29 July 2015. All stakeholder comments were carefully considered in the finalisation of this review.

The department has regularly consulted with New Zealand’s MPI and Australian state and territory government departments during the preparation of this final report. There has also been formal consultation with industry representatives at regular Post-Entry Plant Industry Consultative Committee (PEPICC) meetings.

Anyone interested in this review should register as a stakeholder through the department’s website at Register as a Stakeholder.

How does the department address new scientific information?

Scientific information can be provided to the department at any time, including after a risk analysis has been completed. The department will consider the information provided and will review the import policy.

​

General enquiries

Call 1800 900 090

Contact us online

Report a biosecurity concern

Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip
Page last updated: 04 November 2019

We acknowledge the continuous connection of First Nations Traditional Owners and Custodians to the lands, seas and waters of Australia. We recognise their care for and cultivation of Country. We pay respect to Elders past and present, and recognise their knowledge and contribution to the productivity, innovation and sustainability of Australia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries.

Artwork: Protecting our Country, Growing our Future
© Amy Allerton, contemporary Aboriginal Artist of the Gumbaynggirr, Bundjalung and Gamilaroi nations.

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Facebook X LinkedIn Instagram