Apiaceous crop seed

The department has considered the comments received on the vegetable seed reviews. Comments received are being considered during the finalisation of the reviews, and the development of the Solanaceae draft report.

Further information on the department’s stakeholder engagement activities can be found on Brassicaceous crops seed.

​A review of import conditions for apiaceous crop seed for sowing

We are conducting a review of import conditions for apiaceous crop seeds for sowing. This review is the first in a series of vegetable seed policy reviews, which include Apiaceae (carrot, celery, parsnip, etc.), Brassicaceae (cauliflower, cabbage, etc.), Cucurbitaceae (cucumber, melon, pumpkin, etc.) and Solanaceae (capsicum, eggplant, tomato, etc.) seed.

Most vegetable seeds are currently imported under our standard import conditions for seeds for sowing. Recent changes to the risk profile of apiaceous crop seed have prompted us to review the existing import conditions to ensure they adequately address biosecurity risks.

We will conduct the review in three key steps:

  1. Review scientific information relevant to the groups of pests associated with apiaceous crop seed, and develop proposed risk management measures as per the Vegetable Seeds Policy Review.
  2. Release the draft review on 12 September 2017, via Biosecurity Advice 2017-21 for a 60 day public consultation period, closing on 13 November 2017.
  3. Release the final review in the first half of 2020, following consideration of stakeholder comments. Please note this is an indicative timeline and may be subject to change.

This review is funded by the Australian Government’s Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper to strengthen biosecurity surveillance and analysis.

Make a submission

Stakeholders were invited to submit written comments on the draft review during the 60 day public consultation period. The consultation period closed on 13 November 2017.

Comments received will be considered in finalising the review.

Draft review

The draft review evaluates the effectiveness of existing risk management measures for identified biosecurity risks, and proposes additional mandatory phytosanitary measures to reduce the risk of introduction of the identified quarantine pests, to achieve the appropriate level of protection (ALOP) for Australia.


Document Pages File size
Draft review of import conditions for apiaceous crop seeds for sowing into Australia PDF 232 1.4 MB
Draft review of import conditions for apiaceous crop seeds for sowing into Australia DOC 232 4.3 MB

If you have difficulty accessing these files, visit web accessibility for assistance.

Purpose of the review

Australia relies on the overseas supply of seeds for apiaceous herb and vegetable crop production. Seeds are currently imported in accordance with our standard requirements for the importation of seeds for sowing.

We are undertaking an extensive review of these existing import conditions, including those for apiaceous crops. The review is in response to:

  • an increase in seed-borne pathogens being reported outside their known geographic distribution, in part linked to the increasing globalisation of the vegetable seed trade.
  • the introduction of pathogens to new areas.
  • changes in seed production practices that have increased the likelihood of seed exposure to pathogens.

The review is being conducted as a non-regulated risk analysis to assess the biosecurity risks associated with seeds being imported into Australia.


Acknowledging the change in risk profile, the department is undertaking an extensive review of the existing import conditions for vegetable seeds including those for apiaceous crops.

This review aims to:

  • identify pathogens associated with seeds of highly traded apiaceous crops
  • evaluate the appropriateness of the existing risk management measures
  • propose additional risk management measures where appropriate

Summary of review and proposed measures

This review identifies ten seed-borne pathogens associated with apiaceous crops seeds that meet the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) criteria for a quarantine pest.

The identified quarantine pests are ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’, Cercospora foeniculi, Cercospora malkoffii, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.coriandrii, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini, Phoma complanata, Phomopsis diachenii, Ramularia coriandri, Ramularia foeniculi and Strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRSV).

The unrestricted risk of these quarantine pests does not achieve the appropriate level of protection (ALOP) for Australia. Additional risk management measures are required.

We propose additional phytosanitary measures for seed of Apium graveolens, Carum carvi, Coriandrum sativum, Cuminum cyminum, Daucus carota, Foeniculum vulgare, Pastinaca sativa, Petroselinum crispum and Pimpinella anisum species.

Additional phytosanitary measures include:

  • mandatory testing or treatment (offshore or onshore)

  • requirement that seed lots tested or treated offshore be accompanied by an official phytosanitary certificate endorsed with the additional declaration that the consignment has undergone mandatory treatment or testing in accordance with Australian import conditions.

Not all the apiaceous crop species reviewed were found to be affected by pests of quarantine concern to Australia.

We propose that the seed of the following species do not require testing or treatment, and can continue to be imported under Australia’s standard seed for sowing import requirements: Anethum graveolens, Angelica archangelica, Angelica atropurpurea, Angelica dahurica, Angelica gigas, Angelica glauca, Angelica pachycarpa, Angelica sinensis, Angelica pubescens, Angelica setchuenensis, Angelica sylvestris, Angelica taiwaniana, Angelica triquinata, Angelica ursina, Anthriscus caucalis, Anthriscus cerefolium, Anthriscus sylvestris, Apium prostratum, Carum copticum, Daucus glochidiatu, Pimpinella leptophylla and Pimpinella saxifraga.

We will consider alternative measures to manage the risk of the identified seed-borne pathogens. Alternative measures include sourcing seeds from: pest free areas, pest-free place of production, or produced under a systems approach. However, NPPOs must provide an appropriate submission demonstrating pest free area status, pest-free place of production status or describing their preferred systems approach and rationale, for our consideration.

General information

Register as a stakeholder

The Biosecurity Plant Division uses the stakeholder register for distributing biosecurity risk analysis policy information to registered stakeholders. Stakeholders interested in receiving information and updates on biosecurity risk analyses are invited to subscribe via the department’s new online subscription service. By subscribing to Biosecurity Risk Analysis Plant, you will receive Biosecurity Advices and other notifications relating to plant biosecurity policy.

Protecting Australia from exotic pests

We undertake risk assessments of pests and diseases and identify risk management options to address any risks of exotic pests and diseases. These measures reflect Australia’s overall approach to the management of biosecurity risk.

Zero risk is impossible. Aiming for zero risk would mean no tourists, no international travel and no imports of any commodities. Australia invests heavily in biosecurity to ensure risks are managed.

Australia exports almost two-thirds of its agricultural produce. The future of our agricultural and food industries, including their capacity to contribute to growth and jobs, depends on Australia’s capacity to maintain its animal and plant health status.

Australia accepts imports only when we are confident the risks of pests and diseases can be managed to achieve an appropriate level of protection for Australia.

International obligations

All World Trade Organization (WTO) members are signatories to the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement), under which they have both rights and obligations.

The basic obligations of the SPS Agreement are that SPS measures must:

  • be based on a risk assessment appropriate to the circumstances or drawn from standards developed by the World Organisation for Animal Health and the International Plant Protection Convention
  • only be applied to the extent necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health
  • be based on science
  • not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate between WTO members, or be a disguised restriction on trade.

Under the SPS Agreement, each WTO Member is entitled to maintain a level of protection it considers appropriate to protect human, animal or plant life or health within its territory – in other words, its appropriate level of protection.

Appropriate level of protection

The appropriate level of protection (ALOP) for Australia is defined in the Biosecurity Act 2015 as ‘a high level of sanitary and phytosanitary protection aimed at reducing biosecurity risks to very low, but not to zero’. This definition was agreed with all our state and territory governments and recognises that a zero-risk stance is impractical.

The ALOP is a broad objective, and risk management measures are established to achieve that objective.

Read more about Australia’s ALOP

Biosecurity risk

The term ‘biosecurity risk’ is used to describe the combination of the likelihood and the consequences of a pest or disease of biosecurity concern entering, establishing and spreading in Australia.

Australia's biosecurity system protects our unique environment and agricultural sector and supports our reputation as a safe and reliable trading nation. This has significant economic, environmental and community benefits for all Australians.

New scientific information

Scientific information can be provided to us at any time, including after a risk analysis has been completed. We will consider the information provided and review the analysis.

Meeting Australia’s food standards

Imported food for human consumption must satisfy Australia’s food standards. Australian law requires that all food, including imported fresh fruit, meets the standards set out in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code and the requirements of the Imported Food Control Act 1992. Each state and territory also has its own food laws that must be met.

Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) is responsible for developing and maintaining the Food Standards Code. The standards apply to all food in Australia, irrespective of whether it is grown domestically or imported.

Timing of imports

The recommendations in the final report are an administrative step and reflect the completion of the risk analysis. Before imports can commence we will:

  • verify that a country can action the recommended risk management measures
  • publish import conditions on the Biosecurity Import Conditions System (BICON), and
  • issue import permits for trade to commence.

The decision to import agricultural produce to Australia is a commercial decision between an importer in Australia and a supplier in the exporting country who can meet the import conditions.

Contact information

For more information, stakeholders can email plant stakeholders or phone +61 2 6272 5094.

Last reviewed: 30 September 2020
Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

Please verify that you are not a robot.