Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to search
Home

Top navigation main

  • News & media
  • Jobs
  • Ministers
  • Contact us
Main menu

AWE Main

  • Agriculture and land
    Agriculture and land Building stronger and more sustainable agriculture, fisheries, forestry and land care.
    • Animal health
    • Climate change and agriculture
    • Drought, disaster and rural support
    • Farming, food and drought
    • Fisheries
    • Forestry
    • Levies and charges on agricultural products
    • Mouse infestation advice
    • Plant health
    Xylella

    Protect against unwanted plant pests

    Our biosecurity system helps protects us. Everyone has a role in supporting our biosecurity system.

    Find out more

  • Biosecurity and trade
    Biosecurity and trade
    • Aircraft, vessels and military
    • Biosecurity policy
    • Cats and dogs
    • Exporting
    • Importing
    • Pests, diseases and weeds
    • Public awareness and education
    • Trade and market access
    • Travelling or sending goods to Australia
    • Report a concern
    Brown marmorated stink bug

    BMSB Seasonal Measures

    Australia has strengthened seasonal measures to manage the risk of BMSB.

    View our seasonal measures

  • Science and research
    Science and research Undertaking research and collecting data to support informed decisions and policies.
    • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES)
    • Plant Innovation Centre
    Abares

    ABARES Insights

    Get 'snapshots’ of agricultural, forestry and fisheries industries, or analysis of key issues.

    Find out more

  • About us
    About us We enhance our agricultural industries and trade, and manage the threat of biosecurity risks to Australia.
    • Accountability and reporting
    • Assistance, grants and tenders
    • Contact us
    • Fees and charges
    • News and media
    • Our commitment to you
    • Payments
    • People and jobs
    • Publications
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Budget 2025-26

    Budget 2025-26

    The 2025–26 Portfolio Budget Statements were released on 25 March 2025.

    Find out more

  • Online services
    Online services We do business with you using online platforms. This makes it easier for you to meet your legal requirements.
Department of Agriculture

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Biosecurity and trade
  3. Biosecurity
  4. The Menu of Measures
  5. The Menu of Measures tool

Sidebar first - Biosecurity

  • The Menu of Measures
    • The Menu of Measures tool

The Menu of Measures tool

This Menu serves up a comprehensive range of options to manage trade-related plant biosecurity risks. Browse The Menu to see how each of the 41 unique measures can mitigate risk.

 

About this tool

The Menu of Measures:

  • is a decision support tool that you can use to guide the design, assessment and management of biosecurity risks across the production and supply chain
  • organises measures by the four ways that they can act to reduce biosecurity risks, called Risk Reduction Objectives (RRO)
  • can be applied to all plant pests (invertebrates and pathogens) of quarantine concern, and all traded articles and transport vectors
  • is intended for guidance and does not reflect our official policy.

See how the Menu of Measures was developed.

Risk Reduction Objective 1: Minimise exposure to pests

Measures that provide confidence in pest freedom or low pest prevalence, or that reduce exposure to pests and the risk of infestation when the commodity is vulnerable.

Pest freedom or low pest prevalence

Summary

Measures that provide confidence in pest freedom or low pest prevalence in a designated area or registered site.

There are 4 measures in the category (Table 1). Each provide confidence in pest freedom or low pest prevalence through surveillance, with corrective actions or suspension imposed if agreed pest thresholds are exceeded.

Pest Free Areas and Areas of Low Pest Prevalence are generally more onerous to implement, they require good governance and coordination to establish and maintain. All registered businesses within the designated area can be impacted if thresholds are exceeded.

Demonstrating low pest prevalence within an area or registered site is less onerous than demonstrating pest freedom but may need to be combined with additional measures to manage phytosanitary risks.

Table 1. Summary of the characteristics of the four Pest Freedom or Low Pest Prevalence measures
Category of MeasureMeasureGoalScale – spatialScale – timeAdditional independent measuresRelevant ISPMs
Area widePest Free AreaProvide the required confidence that the target pest does not occur in the designated area, and therefore that all sites registered for trade within the designated area are pest free.Applied to a designated area: country or part thereof.Generally maintained over many years without interruption.Not required.ISPM 04, ISPM 26, ISPM 29.
Area of Low Pest PrevalenceProvide the required confidence that pest prevalence, and therefore infestation risk, on all registered sites within the designated area is acceptably low at times when the commodity is vulnerable.Applied to a designated area: country or part thereof.Generally maintained over many years without interruption.Required if ALPP is not sufficient on its own to manage risk.ISPM 22, ISPM 29. See also WTO-SPS Article 6.
Registered sitePest Free SiteProvide the required confidence that there are no pests in the registered site at times when the commodity is vulnerable.Applied to a registered site where a business is responsible for undertaking regulated trade-related activities such as production, processing, storage and treatment. This includes “places of production” and “production sites”.May be established annually or seasonally.Not required.ISPM 10, ISPM 30.
Low Pest Prevalence SiteProvide the required confidence that pest prevalence, and therefore infestation risk, is acceptably low within the designated site registered by a business, at least when the commodity is vulnerable.Applied to a registered site where a business is responsible for undertaking regulated trade-related activities such as production, processing, storage and treatment. This includes “places of production” and “production sites”.May be established annually or seasonally.Required if LPPS is not sufficient on its own.Not formalised in an ISPM.

Measures

  • Pest free area
  • Area of low pest prevalence
  • Pest free site
  • Low pest prevalence site

Pest management

Summary

Measures that supress pest populations at times when the commodity is vulnerable to infestation.

A wide range of measure options are mostly used to control pests during production, although some can also be applied post-production.

Pest management measures can be considered when assessing risk and applied as phytosanitary measures.

Measures

  • Pesticides
  • Attract and kill
  • Biological control including SIT
  • Hygiene
  • Sanitation
  • Integrated pest and disease management
  • Other pest management options

Pest avoidance

Summary

Measures that limit overlap in time or space between active pest populations and commodities vulnerable to infestation.

Avoidance can be achieved in time (limit seasonal overlap, limit exposure time to pest) or space (poor pest habitat, geographical isolation), or by manipulating the habitat to make it less attractive to the pest. Although most measures in this category are used during production, they can also be applied post-production.

Pest avoidance measures like limiting exposure time to pest are often applied as standard industry practice in production. These can be considered both when assessing and managing phytosanitary risks.

Measures

  • Limit seasonal overlap
  • Limit exposure time to pest
  • Poor pest habitat
  • Geographical isolation
  • Habitat manipulation

Pest exclusion

Summary

Measures that apply physical, temporal or spatial barriers between the pest and the commodity when vulnerable to infestation.

Physical pest exclusion can be achieved at different spatial scales, from the structure or facility (protected facilities) to secure packaging of consignments (safeguarding), down to individual protected units like individually wrapped fruit (protected units). Spatial and temporal exclusion can be achieved by using buffer zones, or ensuring the commodity is separated from sources of infestation during or after production (segregation, pest-free inputs).

Pest exclusion measures can include standard commercial practices that are considered during pest risk assessment. They are commonly applied as phytosanitary measures, including during production (e.g. protected cropping) and to help manage the risk of post-harvest infestation.

Measures

  • Protected facilities
  • Safeguarding
  • Protected units
  • Maintain buffer zone
  • Segregation
  • Pest-free inputs

Risk Reduction Objective 2: Minimise vulnerability to infestation

Measures that reduce the vulnerability or susceptibility of the commodity (host or carrier) to pest infestation.

Host or carrier

Summary

Trade is restricted to commodities that are not hosts (or carriers), or that are modified to make them less vulnerable to infestation.

Trade can be restricted to those varieties or cultivars that are a non-host or poor host for the pest. In some cases, the export standard commodity may be harvested at a developmental stage that is a non-host or poor host for the pest. Quality specifications and prohibit parts of commodity measures can ensure that commodity units or parts thereof, respectively, that are more likely to be infested are excluded. And the vulnerability of the commodity to infestation can also be modified physically or chemically.

Host status is a key consideration when conducting pest risk analysis. Measures that affect host or carrier status can be considered during risk assessment, or be regulated as phytosanitary measures.

Additional measures are not required if the commodity is a non-host. Measures that result in poor host status may be incorporated into a phytosanitary systems approach.

Measures

  • Host or carrier status
  • Poor developmental stage
  • Quality specifications
  • Modify vulnerability
  • Prohibit parts of commodity or carrier

Risk Reduction Objective 3: Reduce infestation rates

Measures that reduce infestation rates, if there is a risk that pests are present in a consignment.

Reduce pests in consignment

Summary

Measures that kill, inactivate, or directly remove pests from the commodity in a consignment.

Depending on the pest and commodity, this can be achieved by applying a treatment, physical processing and disturbance, surface cleaning or removing contaminants.

These measures are commonly commercial practices that can be considered during risk assessment. For example, surface cleaning requirements or extended cold storage that results in pest mortality. Some are used as phytosanitary measures to address general phytosanitary risks (e.g. removal of contaminants) whereas others, such as treatments, can be targeted against high-risk pests.

Measures

  • Treatment
  • Physical disturbance and processing
  • Surface cleaning
  • Remove contaminants

Remove infested commodity units

Summary

Measures that inspect individual commodity units and remove any that show evidence of being infested.

All commodity units are inspected when conducting symptom grading, but only those identified as being high-risk are inspected when risk-profiling.

Can be a common commercial practice (e.g. quality assurance schemes) that may be considered during risk assessment. These can also be applied as a phytosanitary measure, most commonly during post-production.

Measures

  • Symptom grading
  • Risk profiling

Remove infested consignments or high-risk pathways

Summary

Measures that inspect a representative sample of a consignment, with remedial action applied to the consignment or pathway if pests are detected.

Quarantine with remedial action differs from inspection with remedial action in that the consignment is held in quarantine until infestation is detectable.

These measures can be used as phytosanitary measures, most commonly after production.

Inspection with remedial action is also often required of the exporting jurisdiction, with oversight by the NPPO or relevant authority, to provide assurance that entry conditions are working as intended. Importing jurisdictions are generally responsible for quarantine with remedial action and can also choose to undertake an inspection with remedial action.

Measures

  • Inspect with remedial action
  • Quarantine with remedial action

Risk Reduction Objective 4: Reduce the likelihood of pest entry and establishment

Factors that reduce the likelihood of pest entry and establishment. These can be considered when conducting a pest risk assessment, or in some cases be applied as measures.

Limit propagule pressure

Summary

Factors that limit the potential number or frequency of introductions of the pest and its distribution and transfer to a susceptible host within an area.

Trade volume will influence the number or frequency of potential entry events, whereas smaller packaging size can reduce the potential number of individual pests introduced together at any one location. Preventing escape can physically prevent the introduction and release of pests.

Anticipated trade volumes can be considered when conducting a pest risk assessment, whereas limiting packaging size and preventing escape can both inform a risk assessment and be applied as phytosanitary measures.

Measures

  • Trade volume
  • Consignment and packaging size
  • Prevent escapes

Limit export destinations or use

Summary

Factors that affect the ability of the pest to establish and survive within an area.

Imports may be approved to specific areas (poor destination habitat), during certain seasons (poor time of year), or for specific uses (restricted end-use) that are unfavourable for the establishment of the target pest.

The effect of time of year, habitat suitability and specified end-uses on establishment risk are key factors that are considered when conducting a pest risk assessment. As phytosanitary measures, they are mostly applied to pathways where establishment likelihood varies greatly with season or geographically, and where post-border movements can be sufficiently well managed (e.g. for processing).

Measures

  • Poor destination habitat
  • Poor time of year
  • Restricted end-use

General enquiries

Call 1800 900 090

Contact us online

Report a biosecurity concern

Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks! Your feedback has been submitted.

We aren't able to respond to your individual comments or questions.
To contact us directly phone us or submit an online inquiry

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Please verify that you are not a robot.

Skip
Page last updated: 25 July 2025

We acknowledge the continuous connection of First Nations Traditional Owners and Custodians to the lands, seas and waters of Australia. We recognise their care for and cultivation of Country. We pay respect to Elders past and present, and recognise their knowledge and contribution to the productivity, innovation and sustainability of Australia’s agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries.

Artwork: Protecting our Country, Growing our Future
© Amy Allerton, contemporary Aboriginal Artist of the Gumbaynggirr, Bundjalung and Gamilaroi nations.

Footer

  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • FOI

© Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Facebook X LinkedIn Instagram